» Articles » PMID: 18794553

Systematic Review: Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Premixed Insulin Analogues in Type 2 Diabetes

Overview
Journal Ann Intern Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2008 Sep 17
PMID 18794553
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Evidence comparing premixed insulin analogues (a mixture of rapid-acting and intermediate-acting insulin analogues) with other antidiabetic agents is urgently required to guide appropriate therapy.

Purpose: To summarize the English-language literature on the effectiveness and safety of premixed insulin analogues compared with other antidiabetic agents in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Data Sources: The authors searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to February 2008 and sought unpublished data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, and industry.

Study Selection: Studies with control groups that compared premixed insulin analogues with another antidiabetic medication in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Data Extraction: 2 reviewers using standardized protocols performed serial abstraction.

Data Synthesis: Evidence from clinical trials was inconclusive for clinical outcomes, such as mortality. Therefore, the review focused on intermediate outcomes. Premixed insulin analogues were similar to premixed human insulin in decreasing fasting glucose levels, hemoglobin A(1c) levels, and the incidence of hypoglycemia but were more effective in decreasing postprandial glucose levels (mean difference, -1.1 mmol/L; 95% CI, -1.4 to -0.7 mmol/L [-19.2 mg/dL; 95% CI, -25.9 to -12.5 mg/dL]). Compared with long-acting insulin analogues, premixed insulin analogues were superior in decreasing postprandial glucose levels (mean difference, -1.5 mmol/L; CI, -1.9 to -1.2 mmol/L [-27.9 mg/dL; CI, -34.3 to -21.5 mg/dL]) and hemoglobin A(1c) levels (mean difference, -0.39% [CI, -0.50% to -0.28%]) but were inferior in decreasing fasting glucose levels (mean difference, 0.7 mmol/L; CI, 0.3 to 1.0 mmol/L [12.0 mg/dL; CI, 6.0 to 18.1 mg/dL]) and were associated with a higher incidence of hypoglycemia. Compared with noninsulin antidiabetic agents, premixed insulin analogues were more effective in decreasing fasting glucose levels (mean difference, -1.1 mmol/L; CI, -1.7 to -0.6 mmol/L [-20.5 mg/dL; CI, -29.9 to -11.2 mg/dL]), postprandial glucose levels (mean difference, -2.1 mmol/L; CI, -3.4 to -0.8 mmol/L [-37.4 mg/dL; CI, -61.0 to -13.7 mg/dL]), and hemoglobin A(1c) levels (mean difference, -0.49% [CI, -0.86% to -0.12%]) but were associated with a higher incidence of hypoglycemia.

Limitations: The literature search was restricted to studies published in English. Data on clinical outcomes were limited. The small number of studies for each comparison limited assessment of between-study heterogeneity.

Conclusion: Premixed insulin analogues provide glycemic control similar to that of premixed human insulin and may provide tighter glycemic control than long-acting insulin analogues and noninsulin antidiabetic agents.

Citing Articles

Comparing dual oral agents plus insulin vs. Triple oral agents in uncontrolled type II diabetes: A pilot study.

Gul N, Rehman I, Shah Y, Ali A, Ali Z, Shehzad O PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0311435.

PMID: 39570934 PMC: 11581212. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311435.


Human Insulin as an Antidote to the High Cost of Insulin: Clinical Insignificance of Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Differences.

Davidson M Clin Diabetes. 2023; 41(3):438-441.

PMID: 37456099 PMC: 10338278. DOI: 10.2337/cd22-0106.


The Impact of Medical Nutritional Therapy on the Efficacy of Premix Insulin in Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Husaric S, Salihovic A, Kadric N, Iljazovic-Topic S, Pasic J, Divanovic A Mater Sociomed. 2023; 35(1):13-17.

PMID: 37095879 PMC: 10122531. DOI: 10.5455/msm.2023.35.13-17.


Basal Insulin Reduces Glucose Variability and Hypoglycaemia Compared to Premixed Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Study Based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems.

Wang H, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Cai T, Hu Y, Jing T Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13:791439.

PMID: 35574003 PMC: 9092280. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.791439.


Effectiveness of premixed insulin to achieve glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: A retrospective UK cohort study.

Jude E, Trescoli C, Emral R, Ali A, Lubwama R, Palmer K Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020; 23(4):929-937.

PMID: 33319424 PMC: 8048616. DOI: 10.1111/dom.14298.


References
1.
Coscelli C, Iacobellis G, Calderini C, Carleo R, Gobbo M, Di Mario U . Importance of premeal injection time in insulin therapy: Humalog Mix25 is convenient for improved post-prandial glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients with Italian dietary habits. Acta Diabetol. 2004; 40(4):187-92. DOI: 10.1007/s00592-003-0110-2. View

2.
Nauck M, Duran S, Kim D, Johns D, Northrup J, Festa A . A comparison of twice-daily exenatide and biphasic insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes who were suboptimally controlled with sulfonylurea and metformin: a non-inferiority study. Diabetologia. 2006; 50(2):259-67. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-006-0510-2. View

3.
Niskanen L, Jensen L, Rastam J, Nygaard-Pedersen L, Erichsen K, Vora J . Randomized, multinational, open-label, 2-period, crossover comparison of biphasic insulin aspart 30 and biphasic insulin lispro 25 and pen devices in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther. 2004; 26(4):531-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90055-0. View

4.
Bebakar W, Chow C, Kadir K, Suwanwalaikorn S, Vaz J, Bech O . Adding biphasic insulin aspart 30 once or twice daily is more efficacious than optimizing oral antidiabetic treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007; 9(5):724-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2007.00743.x. View

5.
. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2008. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31 Suppl 1:S12-54. DOI: 10.2337/dc08-S012. View