» Articles » PMID: 18793073

Age Differences in Reaction Time and Attention in a National Telephone Sample of Adults: Education, Sex, and Task Complexity Matter

Overview
Journal Dev Psychol
Specialties Pediatrics
Psychology
Date 2008 Sep 17
PMID 18793073
Citations 67
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study demonstrated effects of age, education, and sex on complex reaction time in a large national sample (N = 3,616) with a wide range in age (32-85) and education. Participants completed speeded auditory tasks (from the MIDUS [Midlife in the U.S.] Stop and Go Switch Task) by telephone. Complexity ranged from a simple repeated task to an alternating task that involved central executive processes including attention switching and inhibitory control. Increased complexity was associated with slower responses in older adults, those with lower education, and women, even after controlling for differences in health status. Higher levels of education were associated with greater central executive efficiency across adulthood: Overall, adults with college degrees performed on complex tasks like less educated individuals who were 10 years younger, up to age 75. These findings suggest that advanced education can moderate age differences on complex speeded tasks that require central executive processes, at least up to the point in old age at which biological declines predominate. The approach demonstrates the utility of combining laboratory paradigms with survey methods to enable the study of larger, more diverse and representative samples across the lifespan.

Citing Articles

When and how perceived control buffers against cognitive declines: A moderated mediation analysis.

Hamm J, Lachman M, Duggan K, Mogle J, McGrath R, Parker K Psychol Aging. 2024; 40(1):39-53.

PMID: 39133611 PMC: 11781980. DOI: 10.1037/pag0000841.


Detecting lies in investigative interviews through the analysis of response latencies and error rates to unexpected questions.

Melis G, Ursino M, Scarpazza C, Zangrossi A, Sartori G Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):12268.

PMID: 38806588 PMC: 11133341. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63156-y.


Reliability and validity of a novel attention assessment scale (broken ring enVision search test) in the Chinese population.

Shi Y, Zhang Y Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1375326.

PMID: 38784625 PMC: 11111916. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1375326.


Increased frequency of light physical activity during midlife and old age buffers against cognitive declines.

Hamm J, Parker K, Lachman M, Mogle J, Duggan K, McGrath R J Behav Med. 2024; 47(4):622-634.

PMID: 38429599 PMC: 11290996. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-024-00478-2.


Purposeful and purposeless aging: Structural issues for sense of purpose and their implications for predicting life outcomes.

Pfund G, Olaru G, Allemand M, Hill P Dev Psychol. 2023; 60(1):75-93.

PMID: 37768600 PMC: 10840820. DOI: 10.1037/dev0001633.


References
1.
Christensen H, Hofer S, Mackinnon A, Korten A, Jorm A, Henderson A . Age is no kinder to the better educated: absence of an association investigated using latent growth techniques in a community sample. Psychol Med. 2001; 31(1):15-28. DOI: 10.1017/s0033291799002834. View

2.
Mayr U . Age differences in the selection of mental sets: the role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. Psychol Aging. 2001; 16(1):96-109. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.96. View

3.
Faust M, Balota D, Spieler D, Ferraro F . Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. Psychol Bull. 1999; 125(6):777-99. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.777. View

4.
Perls T . The oldest old. Sci Am. 1995; 272(1):70-5. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0195-70. View

5.
Gerstorf D, Herlitz A, Smith J . Stability of sex differences in cognition in advanced old age: the role of education and attrition. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006; 61(4):P245-9. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/61.4.p245. View