» Articles » PMID: 18783719

Development of an O(6)-alkylguanine-DNA Alkyltransferase Assay Based on Covalent Transfer of the Benzyl Moiety from [benzene-3H]O(6)-benzylguanine to the Protein

Overview
Journal Anal Biochem
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2008 Sep 12
PMID 18783719
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although it is known that (i) O(6)-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) confers tumor cell resistance to guanine O(6)-targeting drugs such as cloretazine, carmustine, and temozolomide and that (ii) AGT levels in tumors are highly variable, measurement of AGT activity in tumors before treatment is not a routine clinical practice. This derives in part from the lack of a reliable clinical AGT assay; therefore, a simple AGT assay was devised based on transfer of radioactive benzyl residues from [benzene-3H]O(6)-benzylguanine ([3H]BG) to AGT. The assay involves incubation of intact cells or cell homogenates with [3H]BG and measurement of radioactivity in a 70% methanol precipitable fraction. Approximately 85% of AGT in intact cells was recovered in cell homogenates. Accuracy of the AGT assay was confirmed by examination of AGT levels by Western blot analysis with the exception of false-positive results in melanin-containing cells due to [3H]BG binding to melanin. Second-order kinetic constants for human and murine AGT were 1100 and 380 M(-1)s(-1), respectively. AGT levels in various human cell lines ranged from less than 500 molecules/cell (detection limit) to 45,000 molecules/cell. Rodent cell lines frequently lacked AGT expression, and AGT levels in rodent cells were much lower than in human cells.

Citing Articles

Design Strategy for the EPR Tumor-Targeting of 1,2-Bis(sulfonyl)-1-alkylhydrazines.

Penketh P, Williamson H, Baumann R, Shyam K Molecules. 2021; 26(2).

PMID: 33419160 PMC: 7825511. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26020259.


MGMT promoter methylation in triple negative breast cancer of the GeparSixto trial.

Jank P, Gehlhaar C, Bianca L, Caterina F, Andreas S, Karn T PLoS One. 2020; 15(8):e0238021.

PMID: 32841306 PMC: 7446962. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238021.


Fluorescence determination of the activity of O-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase based on the activation of restriction endonuclease and the use of graphene oxide.

Le D, Jiang J Mikrochim Acta. 2020; 187(5):300.

PMID: 32347374 DOI: 10.1007/s00604-020-04280-0.


Physicochemical Considerations of Tumor Selective Drug Delivery and Activity Confinement with Particular Reference to 1,2-Bis(Sulfonyl)-1- Alkylhydrazines Delivery.

Penketh P, Williamson H, Shyam K Curr Drug Deliv. 2020; 17(5):362-374.

PMID: 32342817 PMC: 7499353. DOI: 10.2174/1567201817666200427215044.


A journey down to hell: new thermostable protein-tags for biotechnology at high temperatures.

Mattossovich R, Merlo R, Fontana A, DIppolito G, Terns M, Watts E Extremophiles. 2019; 24(1):81-91.

PMID: 31555904 PMC: 9121916. DOI: 10.1007/s00792-019-01134-3.


References
1.
Esteller M, Hamilton S, Burger P, Baylin S, Herman J . Inactivation of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase by promoter hypermethylation is a common event in primary human neoplasia. Cancer Res. 1999; 59(4):793-7. View

2.
Newlands E, Stevens M, Wedge S, Wheelhouse R, Brock C . Temozolomide: a review of its discovery, chemical properties, pre-clinical development and clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rev. 1997; 23(1):35-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0305-7372(97)90019-0. View

3.
Finch R, Shyam K, Penketh P, Sartorelli A . 1,2-Bis(methylsulfonyl)-1-(2-chloroethyl)-2-(methylamino)carbonylhydrazine (101M): a novel sulfonylhydrazine prodrug with broad-spectrum antineoplastic activity. Cancer Res. 2001; 61(7):3033-8. View

4.
Crone T, Goodtzova K, Edara S, Pegg A . Mutations in human O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase imparting resistance to O6-benzylguanine. Cancer Res. 1994; 54(23):6221-7. View

5.
Ando H, Kondoh H, Ichihashi M, Hearing V . Approaches to identify inhibitors of melanin biosynthesis via the quality control of tyrosinase. J Invest Dermatol. 2007; 127(4):751-61. DOI: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700683. View