» Articles » PMID: 1878267

Longer Booking Intervals in General Practice: Effects on Doctors' Stress and Arousal

Overview
Journal Br J Gen Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 1991 May 1
PMID 1878267
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A controlled trial was carried out to determine whether longer booking intervals at surgeries affected general practitioners' self-assessed levels of stress and arousal. Sixteen general practitioners from 10 practices took part. Surgery sessions with patients booked at 10 minute intervals (experimental sessions) were compared with the doctors' usual booking intervals of between 7.5 and 5.0 minutes (control sessions). Stress and arousal were assessed by the general practitioner before and after each surgery session using a mood adjective check list. The study included 109 experimental and 184 control sessions. The median consultation length increased from six minutes in the control sessions to seven minutes in the experimental sessions. At the end of the experimental sessions, stress scores were lower, and arousal scores higher than at the end of the control sessions (P less than 0.001). There were no significant differences between experimental and control sessions in stress or arousal at the start of the sessions. Favourable mood changes were seen more consistently in the experimental sessions than control sessions, with less than a quarter of doctors showing increased stress or decreased arousal after sessions relative to before. It is concluded that longer booking intervals are of psychological advantage to general practitioners.

Citing Articles

Does the duration of ambulatory consultations affect the quality of healthcare? A systematic review.

Leon-Garcia M, Wieringa T, Espinoza Suarez N, Hernandez-Leal M, Villanueva G, Ospina N BMJ Open Qual. 2023; 12(4).

PMID: 37875307 PMC: 10603464. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002311.


Patient Safety: A Deep Concern to Caregivers.

Mohiuddin A Innov Pharm. 2021; 10(1).

PMID: 34007529 PMC: 7643701. DOI: 10.24926/iip.v10i1.1639.


International variations in primary care physician consultation time: a systematic review of 67 countries.

Irving G, Neves A, Dambha-Miller H, Oishi A, Tagashira H, Verho A BMJ Open. 2017; 7(10):e017902.

PMID: 29118053 PMC: 5695512. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017902.


Investigating the relationship between consultation length and patient experience: a cross-sectional study in primary care.

Elmore N, Burt J, Abel G, Maratos F, Montague J, Campbell J Br J Gen Pract. 2016; 66(653):e896-e903.

PMID: 27777231 PMC: 5198642. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X687733.


Interventions to increase or decrease the length of primary care physicians' consultation.

Wilson A, Childs S, Goncalves-Bradley D, Irving G Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; (8):CD003540.

PMID: 27560697 PMC: 7154578. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003540.pub3.


References
1.
MORRELL D, Roland M . How can good general practitioner care be achieved?. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987; 294(6565):161-2. PMC: 1245168. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.294.6565.161. View

2.
Lowenthal L, BINGHAM E . Length of consultation: how well do patient's choose?. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987; 37(304):498-9. PMC: 1711118. View

3.
Roland M, Bartholomew J, Courtenay M, Morris R, MORRELL D . The "five minute" consultation: effect of time constraint on verbal communication. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986; 292(6524):874-6. PMC: 1339979. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.292.6524.874. View

4.
MORRELL D, Evans M, Morris R, Roland M . The "five minute" consultation: effect of time constraint on clinical content and patient satisfaction. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986; 292(6524):870-3. PMC: 1339978. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.292.6524.870. View

5.
. Mathematical relationship between waiting times and appointment interval for doctor and patients. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989; 39(329):492-4. PMC: 1712214. View