» Articles » PMID: 18780317

Treatment of Malignant Pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma with Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Dacarbazine: Recommendation from a 22-year Follow-up of 18 Patients

Overview
Journal Cancer
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Oncology
Date 2008 Sep 10
PMID 18780317
Citations 103
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A long-term follow-up was conducted of 18 patients with a diagnosis of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma treated with a combination of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dacarbazine (CVD).

Methods: The study design was a nonrandomized, single-arm trial conducted at a government medical referral center. Eighteen patients with metastatic malignant pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma were studied. After controlling symptoms of catecholamine excess, patients were treated with cyclophosphamide at 750 mg/m(2), vincristine at 1.4 mg/m(2), and dacarbazine at 600 mg/m(2) on Day 1 and dacarbazine at 600 mg/m(2) on Day 2, every 21 to 28 days.

Results: Combination chemotherapy with CVD produced a complete response rate of 11% and a partial response rate of 44%. Median survival from a landmark was 3.8 years for patients whose tumors responded to therapy and 1.8 years for patients whose tumors did not respond (P = .65). All patients with tumors scored as responding reported improvement in their symptoms related to excessive catecholamine release and had objective improvements in blood pressure. CVD was well tolerated with only grade I/II toxicities.

Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy with CVD produced objective tumor responses in patients with advanced malignant pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma. In this 22-year follow-up there was no difference in overall survival between patients whose tumors objectively shrank and those with stable or progressive disease. However, patients reported improvement in symptoms, had objective improvements in blood pressure, and had tumor shrinkage that made surgical resection possible. The authors conclude that CVD therapy is not indicated in every patient with metastatic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma, but should be considered in the management of patients with symptoms and where tumor shrinkage might be beneficial.

Citing Articles

Pheochromocytoma: an updated scoping review from clinical presentation to management and treatment.

Saavedra T J, Nati-Castillo H, Valderrama Cometa L, Rivera-Martinez W, Asprilla J, Castano-Giraldo C Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1433582.

PMID: 39735644 PMC: 11671257. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1433582.


Prognosis and tumor microenvironment in pseudohypoxic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma.

Ohmoto A, Shigematsu Y, Saito R, Dobashi A, Fujiwara Y, Togashi Y Virchows Arch. 2024; .

PMID: 39694932 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-024-04009-x.


Molecular Genetics of Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma.

Wachtel H, Nathanson K Curr Opin Endocr Metab Res. 2024; 36.

PMID: 39328362 PMC: 11424047. DOI: 10.1016/j.coemr.2024.100527.


International consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma in children and adolescents.

Casey R, Hendriks E, Deal C, Waguespack S, Wiegering V, Redlich A Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2024; 20(12):729-748.

PMID: 39147856 DOI: 10.1038/s41574-024-01024-5.


Evaluation of pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of [211At] meta-astatobenzylguanidine ([211At] MABG) in patients with pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma (PPGL): A study protocol.

Kobayakawa M, Shiga T, Takahashi K, Sugawara S, Nomura K, Hanada K PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0303623.

PMID: 38805424 PMC: 11132457. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303623.


References
1.
REMINE W, Chong G, Van Heerden J, Sheps S, HARRISON Jr E . Current management of pheochromocytoma. Ann Surg. 1974; 179(5):740-8. PMC: 1356065. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-197405000-00029. View

2.
Plouin P, Chatellier G, Fofol I, Corvol P . Tumor recurrence and hypertension persistence after successful pheochromocytoma operation. Hypertension. 1997; 29(5):1133-9. DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.29.5.1133. View

3.
Van Heerden J, Sheps S, Hamberger B, Sheedy 2nd P, Poston J, REMINE W . Pheochromocytoma: current status and changing trends. Surgery. 1982; 91(4):367-73. View

4.
ANDERSON J, Cain K, Gelber R . Analysis of survival by tumor response. J Clin Oncol. 1983; 1(11):710-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1983.1.11.710. View

5.
Kulke M, Stuart K, Enzinger P, Ryan D, Clark J, Muzikansky A . Phase II study of temozolomide and thalidomide in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(3):401-6. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.6046. View