Two Decades of Minimally Invasive Pediatric Surgery-taking Stock
Overview
Pediatrics
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The past 2 decades have seen a rapid integration of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to pediatric surgical practice. This study endeavored to delineate the current status of MIS in pediatric surgery.
Methods: Three hundred six pediatric surgeons were invited to participate in an anonymous Web-based survey. Apart from demographic details and opinion regarding robotic surgery, surgeons were asked to choose between "perform MIS," "do not perform MIS but recommend it," and "MIS not indicated" for common pediatric surgical conditions.
Results: Responses were received from 117 pediatric surgeons (38.2%). Sixty-one percent of respondents did more than 10% of their work using MIS, and 85% had more than 5 years experience in MIS. Cholecystectomy, nonpalpable testis, and exploration for abdominal pain scored highest among the positive recommendations for MIS, whereas liver tumors, biliary atresia, Wilms' tumor, and inguinal hernia scored highest among the negative recommendations for MIS. Fifty-one percent of the respondents had more than 20 years experience as a pediatric surgeon and were categorized as "senior" surgeons. Compared with the young surgeons, the senior surgeons were more likely to recommend MIS as a contraindication for simple and complicated appendicitis, reduction of intussusception, gastrostomy, fundoplication, pyloromyotomy, adhesiolysis, splenectomy, adrenalectomy, nephrectomy for dysplastic kidneys, heminephrectomy, pyeloplasty, anorectal malformations, pyeloplasty, achalasia cardia, hiatal hernia repair, lung resection, and diaphragmatic hernia repair. More than half the respondents believed that robotic surgery has a role for children in the future.
Conclusions: A widespread integration of MIS into the pediatric surgical practice is evident from this study. Current practice and recommendations of the surveyed surgeons have been outlined. Significant differences between the young and senior surgeons reflect the evolving nature of the recommendations.
Eurlings R, Killaars R, Cakir H, Dirix M, Theeuws O, Staib L Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(17).
PMID: 39273726 PMC: 11394770. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12171703.
The safe introduction of robotic surgery in a free-standing children's hospital.
Hey M, Mayhew M, Masterson S, Calisto J, Shaffiey S, Malvezzi L J Robot Surg. 2023; 17(5):2369-2374.
PMID: 37421569 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01663-2.
Simmons K, Chandrapal J, Wolf S, Rice H, Tracy E, Fitzgerald T J Pediatr Urol. 2021; 17(4):534.e1-534.e7.
PMID: 33849794 PMC: 8449787. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.03.010.
Wilms tumor: a review of current surgical controversies.
Milford K, DeCotiis K, Lorenzo A Transl Androl Urol. 2020; 9(5):2382-2392.
PMID: 33209711 PMC: 7658176. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2020.03.03.
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for pediatric tumors: a bicenter experience.
Meignan P, Ballouhey Q, LeJeune J, Braik K, Longis B, Cook A J Robot Surg. 2017; 12(3):501-508.
PMID: 29288372 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0773-2.