» Articles » PMID: 18773998

Usefulness of N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide and Brain Natriuretic Peptide to Predict Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Overview
Journal Am J Cardiol
Date 2008 Sep 9
PMID 18773998
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

More than 40% of patients hospitalized with heart failure have preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HF-PLVEF) and are at high risk for cardiovascular (CV) events. The purpose of this study was to determine the value of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in predicting CV outcomes in patients with HF-PLVEF. Participants with an ejection fraction >40% in the prospective CHARM Echocardiographic Substudy were included in this analysis. Plasma NT-proBNP levels were measured, and 2 cut-offs were selected prospectively at 300 pg/ml and 600 pg/ml. BNP cut-off was set at 100 pg/ml. Clinical characteristics were recorded, and systolic and diastolic function were evaluated by echocardiography. The primary substudy outcome was the composite of CV mortality, hospitalization for heart failure, and myocardial infarction or stroke. A total of 181 patients were included, and there were 17 primary CV events (9.4%) during a median follow-up time of 524 days. In a model including clinical characteristics, echocardiographic measures, and BNP or NT-proBNP, the composite CV event outcome was best predicted by NT-proBNP >300 pg/ml (hazard ratio 5.8, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.3 to 26.4, p = 0.02) and moderate or severe diastolic dysfunction on echocardiography. When NT-proBNP >600 pg/ml was used in the model, it was the sole independent predictor of primary CV events (hazard ratio 8.0, 95% CI 2.6 to 24.8, p = 0.0003) as was BNP >100 pg/ml (hazard ratio 3.1, 95% CI 1.2 to 8.2, p = 0.02) in the BNP model. In conclusion, both elevated NT-proBNP and BNP are strong independent predictors of clinical events in patients with HF-PLVEF.

Citing Articles

Novel Strategies in Diagnosing Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Mancusi C, Basile C, Spaccarotella C, Gargiulo G, Fucile I, Paolillo S High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2024; 31(2):127-140.

PMID: 38489152 PMC: 11043114. DOI: 10.1007/s40292-024-00629-1.


Physical performance and glycemic control under SGLT-2-inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases or high cardiovascular risk (PUSH): Design of a 4-week prospective observational study.

Frundi D, Kettig E, Popp L, Hoffman M, Dumartin M, Hughes M Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:907385.

PMID: 35935634 PMC: 9354468. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.907385.


Factors associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with septic shock.

Ge W, Li F, Hu B, Wang L, Ren D Eur J Med Res. 2022; 27(1):134.

PMID: 35897043 PMC: 9327319. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-022-00761-5.


Ensemble machine learning model identifies patients with HFpEF from matrix-related plasma biomarkers.

Ward M, Yeganegi A, Baicu C, Bradshaw A, Spinale F, Zile M Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2022; 322(5):H798-H805.

PMID: 35275763 PMC: 8993521. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00497.2021.


Beta-blockers and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system for chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Martin N, Manoharan K, Davies C, Lumbers R Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 5:CD012721.

PMID: 34022072 PMC: 8140651. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012721.pub3.