» Articles » PMID: 18772487

Treatment of Palpable Varicocele in Infertile Men: a Meta-analysis to Define the Best Technique

Overview
Journal J Androl
Date 2008 Sep 6
PMID 18772487
Citations 109
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To date, there have been no randomized, controlled, prospective clinical studies that compare various techniques to describe the best method for the treatment of varicocele in infertile men. This meta-analysis aims to address the best treatment modality for palpable varicocele in infertile men. A MEDLINE search was performed for articles published between January 1980 and April 2008, and we analyzed 36 studies reporting postoperative spontaneous pregnancy rates and/or complication rates after varicocele repair using various techniques in infertile men with palpable unilateral or bilateral varicocele. Spontaneous pregnancy rates and postoperative complications such as hydrocele formation, recurrence, or persistence were compared among the techniques. In addition, interventional failure with radiologic embolization and reported complications with the laparoscopic approach were reviewed. Overall spontaneous pregnancy rates were 37.69% in the Palomo technique series, 41.97% in the microsurgical varicocelectomy techniques, 30.07% in the laparoscopic varicocelectomy techniques, 33.2% in the radiologic embolization, and 36% in the macroscopic inguinal (Ivanissevich) varicocelectomy series, revealing significant differences among the techniques (P = .001). Overall recurrence rates were 14.97% in the Palomo technique series, 1.05% in the microsurgical varicocelectomy techniques, 4.3% in the laparoscopic varicocelectomy techniques, 12.7% in the radiologic embolization, and 2.63% in the macroscopic inguinal (Ivanissevich) or subinguinal varicocelectomy series, revealing significant difference among the techniques (P = .001). Overall hydrocele formation rates were 8.24% in the Palomo technique series, 0.44% in the microsurgical varicocelectomy techniques, 2.84% in the laparoscopic varicocelectomy, and 7.3% in the macroscopic inguinal (Ivanissevich) or subinguinal varicocelectomy series, revealing significant difference among the techniques (P = .001). We conclude that the microsurgical varicocelectomy technique has higher spontaneous pregnancy rates and lower postoperative recurrence and hydrocele formation than conventional varicocelectomy techniques in infertile men. However, prospective, randomized, and comparative studies with large number of patients are needed to compare the efficacy of microsurgical varicocelectomy with that of other treatment modalities in infertile men with varicocele.

Citing Articles

Percutaneous Embolization for Painful Varicocele: An 8-Year Tertiary Centre Experience.

Haroun P, Murgo S, Mjaess G, Roumeguere T, Tannouri F J Belg Soc Radiol. 2025; 109(1):2.

PMID: 39927209 PMC: 11804183. DOI: 10.5334/jbsr.3769.


Varicocele repair for severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia: Scoping review of published guidelines, and systematic review of the literature.

Japari A, El Ansari W Arab J Urol. 2025; 23(1):33-52.

PMID: 39776560 PMC: 11703451. DOI: 10.1080/20905998.2024.2400629.


Preserving one artery shortens the surgical time and does not affect the efficacy of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy: preliminary findings from a retrospective study.

Cao X, Tian C, Feng W, Zhu S, Chen K, Zheng Y BMC Urol. 2024; 24(1):277.

PMID: 39709391 PMC: 11662722. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01670-x.


Value of interventional radiology and their contributions to modern medical systems.

Campbell 4th W, Chick J, Shin D, Makary M Front Radiol. 2024; 4:1403761.

PMID: 39086502 PMC: 11288872. DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2024.1403761.


Effects of Systolic Blood Pressure Elevation on Internal Sperm Artery Identification During Microsurgical Subinguinal Varicocelectomy.

Kebing Y, Chenglu W, Xiaobo X, Tiliwalidi A, Liao Z Am J Mens Health. 2024; 18(4):15579883241265071.

PMID: 39066591 PMC: 11289806. DOI: 10.1177/15579883241265071.