» Articles » PMID: 18766349

Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Arteries of the Hand. A Comparison Between an Extracellular and an Intravascular Contrast Agent

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2008 Sep 4
PMID 18766349
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality of the intravascular contrast agent gadofosveset with the extracellular contrast agent gadoterate meglumine in time-resolved three-dimensional magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the human arteries of the hand. The value of cuff compression technique for suppression of venous enhancement for both contrast agents was also investigated. Three-dimensional MR angiograms of both hands of 11 healthy volunteers were acquired for each contrast agent at 1.5-T, while subsystolic cuff compression was applied at one side. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation were performed and analyzed with Student's t-test. Visualization of vessels was superior in the images acquired with gadofosveset, especially in the late phases. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation showed significantly higher values for gadofosveset. The cuff compression at the lower arm proved to be an effective method to enhance arterial vessels. In conclusion the blood pool agent gadofosveset is superior for the dynamic imaging of the vessels of the hand when compared with the extracellular contrast agent gadoterate meglumine. To fully utilize the advantages of intravascular contrast agents, venous overlay has to be delayed or reduced, which can be achieved effectively by subsystolic lower arm cuff compression.

Citing Articles

High spatial resolution time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography of lower extremity tumors at 3T: Comparison with computed tomography angiography.

Wu G, Jin T, Li T, Morelli J, Li X Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95(37):e4894.

PMID: 27631262 PMC: 5402605. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004894.


The diagnostic value of time-resolved MR angiography with Gadobutrol at 3 T for preoperative evaluation of lower extremity tumors: Comparison with computed tomography angiography.

Wu G, Jin T, Li T, Li X Eur J Radiol Open. 2016; 3:239-44.

PMID: 27622202 PMC: 5009234. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2016.08.006.


High temporal and spatial resolution 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the hands and feet.

Haider C, Riederer S, Borisch E, Glockner J, Grimm R, Hulshizer T J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 34(1):2-12.

PMID: 21698702 PMC: 3122144. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22469.


High-relaxivity contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging: a review.

Giesel F, Mehndiratta A, Essig M Eur Radiol. 2010; 20(10):2461-74.

PMID: 20567832 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1805-8.

References
1.
Rohrer M, Bauer H, Mintorovitch J, Requardt M, Weinmann H . Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Invest Radiol. 2005; 40(11):715-24. DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000184756.66360.d3. View

2.
Wentz K, Frohlich J, von Weymarn C, Patak M, Jenelten R, Zollikofer C . High-resolution magnetic resonance angiography of hands with timed arterial compression (tac-MRA). Lancet. 2003; 361(9351):49-50. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12112-5. View

3.
Wang Y, Chen C, Chabra S, Winchester P, Khilnani N, Watts R . Bolus arterial-venous transit in the lower extremity and venous contamination in bolus chase three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol. 2002; 37(8):458-63. DOI: 10.1097/00004424-200208000-00007. View

4.
Wang Y, Yu Y, Li D, Bae K, Brown J, Lin W . Artery and vein separation using susceptibility-dependent phase in contrast-enhanced MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 12(5):661-70. DOI: 10.1002/1522-2586(200011)12:5<661::aid-jmri2>3.0.co;2-l. View

5.
Prince M, Chabra S, Watts R, Chen C, Winchester P, Khilnani N . Contrast material travel times in patients undergoing peripheral MR angiography. Radiology. 2002; 224(1):55-61. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2241011338. View