» Articles » PMID: 18766093

The Effect of a Quantitative Resuscitation Strategy on Mortality in Patients with Sepsis: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Crit Care Med
Date 2008 Sep 4
PMID 18766093
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Quantitative resuscitation consists of structured cardiovascular intervention targeting predefined hemodynamic end points. We sought to measure the treatment effect of quantitative resuscitation on mortality from sepsis.

Data Sources: We conducted a systematic review of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, conference proceedings, clinical practice guidelines, and other sources using a comprehensive strategy.

Study Selection: We identified randomized control trials comparing quantitative resuscitation with standard resuscitation in adult patients who were diagnosed with sepsis using standard criteria. The primary outcome variable was mortality.

Data Abstraction: Three authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality using standardized instruments; consensus was reached by conference. Preplanned subgroup analysis required studies to be categorized based on early (at the time of diagnosis) vs. late resuscitation implementation. We used the chi-square test and I to assess for statistical heterogeneity (p < 0.10, I > 25%). The primary analysis was based on the random effects model to produce pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: The search yielded 29 potential publications; nine studies were included in the final analysis, providing a sample of 1001 patients. The combined results demonstrate a decrease in mortality (odds ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.96); however, there was statistically significant heterogeneity (p = 0.07, I = 45%). Among the early quantitative resuscitation studies (n = 6) there was minimal heterogeneity (p = 0.40, I = 2.4%) and a significant decrease in mortality (odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.69). The late quantitative resuscitation studies (n = 3) demonstrated no significant effect on mortality (odds ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 0.60-2.22).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis found that applying an early quantitative resuscitation strategy to patients with sepsis imparts a significant reduction in mortality.

Citing Articles

[Early source control of infection in patients seen in the emergency department: a systematic review].

Julian-Jimenez A, Lorenzo Alvarez R, Gutierrez Bueno V, Sanchez Trujillo M, Eduardo Garcia D Rev Esp Quimioter. 2024; 37(4):323-333.

PMID: 38742536 PMC: 11231492. DOI: 10.37201/req/027.2024.


Timing and clinical risk factors for early acquisition of gut pathogen colonization with multidrug resistant organisms in the intensive care unit.

Shamalov L, Heath M, Lynch E, Green D, Gomez-Simmonds A, Freedberg D Gut Pathog. 2024; 16(1):10.

PMID: 38383457 PMC: 10880254. DOI: 10.1186/s13099-024-00605-z.


Dynamic monitoring tools for patients admitted to the emergency department with circulatory failure: narrative review with panel-based recommendations.

Douglas I, Elwan M, Najarro M, Romagnoli S Eur J Emerg Med. 2024; 31(2):98-107.

PMID: 38364037 PMC: 11232941. DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001103.


Easy method to determine fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: end-tidal CO2 - a prospective observational study.

Ozkarakas H, Ucar O, Tekgul Z, Ozmuk O, Ozturk M, Bilgin M Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024; 30(2):90-96.

PMID: 38305657 PMC: 10977503. DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.37309.


A combination of the Modified Early Warning Score and the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale as a triage tool in patients with infection.

Ryu S, Oh S, Lee B, Jeon S Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2023; 10(1):60-67.

PMID: 36588422 PMC: 10090726. DOI: 10.15441/ceem.22.339.


References
1.
Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B . Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2002; 345(19):1368-77. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa010307. View

2.
Marik P, Varon J . Goal-directed therapy for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(13):1025-6; author reply 1025-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200203283461314. View

3.
Jones A, Kline J . Use of goal-directed therapy for severe sepsis and septic shock in academic emergency departments. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33(8):1888-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000166872.78449.b1. View

4.
Macias W, Nelson D, Williams M, Garg R, Janes J, Sashegyi A . Lack of evidence for qualitative treatment by disease severity interactions in clinical studies of severe sepsis. Crit Care. 2005; 9(6):R607-22. PMC: 1414006. DOI: 10.1186/cc3795. View

5.
Wang X, Lu C, Gao F, Li X, Yan W, Ning F . [Efficacy of goal-directed therapy in the treatment of septic shock]. Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2006; 18(11):661-4. View