» Articles » PMID: 18765408

Diagnosing Type 2 Diabetes Before Patients Complain of Diabetic Symptoms--clinical Opportunistic Screening in a Single General Practice

Overview
Journal Fam Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 2008 Sep 4
PMID 18765408
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the UK, patients normally see their general practitioner first and 86% of the health needs of the population are managed in general practice, with 14% being referred to specialist/hospital care. Early diagnosis is the privilege of general practice since general practitioners make most medical diagnoses in the NHS. Their historic aim has been to diagnose as early as possible and if possible before patients are aware of symptoms. Over time, diagnoses are being made earlier in the trajectory of chronic diseases and pre-symptomatic diagnoses through tests like cervical screening. Earlier diagnosis benefits patients and allows earlier treatment. In diabetes, the presence of lower HbA1c levels correlates with fewer complications. Methodologically, single practice research means smaller populations but greater ability to track patients and ask clinicians about missing data. All diagnoses of type 2 diabetes, wherever made, were tracked until death or transfer out. Clinical opportunistic screening has been undervalued and is more cost-effective than population screening. It works best in generalist practice. Over 19 consecutive years, all 429 patients with type 2 diabetes in one NHS general practice were analysed. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes rose from 1.1% to 3.0% of the registered population. Since 2000, 95.9% were diagnosed within the general practice and the majority (70/121 = 57.9%) of diagnoses were made before the patients reported any diabetes-related symptom. These patients had median HbA1c levels 1.1% lower than patients diagnosed after reporting symptoms, a clinically and statistically significant difference (P = 0.01).

Citing Articles

Core management data in general practice.

Pereira Gray D, Sidaway-Lee K, Kingdon H, Dineen M, Evans P, Harding A Br J Gen Pract. 2019; 70(690):36-37.

PMID: 31879311 PMC: 6919511. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X707669.


Effect of mobile reminders on screening yield during opportunistic screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus in a primary health care setting: A randomized trial.

Kumar S, Shewade H, Vasudevan K, Durairaju K, Santhi V, Sunderamurthy B Prev Med Rep. 2016; 2:640-4.

PMID: 26844130 PMC: 4721301. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.08.008.


Platelet mitochondrial dysfunction of DM rats and DM patients.

Wu F, Liu Y, Luo L, Lu Y, Yew D, Xu J Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8(5):6937-46.

PMID: 26221230 PMC: 4509175.


Diagnosing type 2 diabetes and identifying high-risk individuals using the new glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) criteria.

Evans P, Pereira Gray D, Wright C, Langley P Br J Gen Pract. 2013; 63(610):235.

PMID: 23781560 PMC: 4625789.


Perceived symptoms in people living with impaired glucose tolerance.

Andersson S, Ekman I, Lindblad U, Friberg F Nurs Res Pract. 2011; 2011:937038.

PMID: 21994845 PMC: 3169241. DOI: 10.1155/2011/937038.


References
1.
Gray D, Steele R, Sweeney K, Evans P . Generalists in medicine. BMJ. 1994; 308(6927):486-7. PMC: 2542775. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.308.6927.486. View

2.
Adriaanse M, Dekker J, Spijkerman A, Twisk J, Nijpels G, VAN DER Ploeg H . Health-related quality of life in the first year following diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes: newly diagnosed patients in general practice compared with screening-detected patients. The Hoorn Screening Study. Diabet Med. 2004; 21(10):1075-81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01277.x. View

3.
Beale N, Nethercott S . The nature of unemployment morbidity. 1. Recognition. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988; 38(310):197-9. PMC: 1711449. View

4.
Sweeney K, Gray D . Patients who do not receive continuity of care from their general practitioner--are they a vulnerable group?. Br J Gen Pract. 1995; 45(392):133-5. PMC: 1239173. View

5.
. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997; 20(7):1183-97. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.20.7.1183. View