» Articles » PMID: 18765164

Evaluation of a Social Support Measure That May Indicate Risk of Depression During Pregnancy

Overview
Journal J Affect Disord
Date 2008 Sep 4
PMID 18765164
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Strong social support has been linked with positive mental health and better birth outcomes for pregnant women. Our aim was to replicate the psychometric properties of the Kendler Social Support Interview modified for use in pregnant women and to establish the inventory's relationship to depression in pregnancy.

Methods: The modified Kendler Social Support Interview (MKSSI) was evaluated using principal components analysis. The association with depression was used as an indicator of external validity and was assessed by logistic regression.

Results: Data from 783 subjects were analyzed. One large principal component, termed "global support," (eigenvalue=6.086) represented 22.5% of the total variance. However, 6 of the 27 items (frequency of contact with spouse, siblings, other relatives, and friends, and attendance at church and clubs) had low levels of association (<0.4) and thus were excluded from suggested items for a total score. Varimax rotation of the remaining 21 items resulted in subscales that fell into expected groupings: mother, father, siblings, friends, etc. One unit and two unit increases in the global support score were associated with 58.3% (OR=0.417, 95% CI=0.284-0.612) and 82.6% (OR=0.174, 95% CI=0.081-0.374) reductions in odds for depression, respectively.

Limitations: The ability of this social support scale to predict future depression in pregnancy has not yet been established due to cross-sectional design.

Conclusion: The MKSSI is reliable and valid for use in evaluating social support and its relationship to depression in pregnant women.

Citing Articles

Psychological, Psychosocial and Obstetric Differences between Spanish and Immigrant Mothers: Retrospective Observational Study.

Martinez Herreros M, Rodriguez Munoz M, Izquierdo Mendez N, Olivares Crespo M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(18).

PMID: 36142058 PMC: 9517456. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811782.


How a pregnant woman's relationships with her siblings relate to her mental health: a prenatal allocare perspective.

Fox M, Wiley K Evol Med Public Health. 2022; 10(1):1-20.

PMID: 35154777 PMC: 8830312. DOI: 10.1093/emph/eoab044.


The association between social support and antenatal depressive and anxiety symptoms among Australian women.

Bedaso A, Adams J, Peng W, Sibbritt D BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 21(1):708.

PMID: 34686140 PMC: 8532351. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04188-4.


Material hardship is associated with posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms among low-income Black women.

Holmes S, Callinan L, Facemire V, Williams M, Ciarleglio M, Smith M J Trauma Stress. 2021; 34(5):905-916.

PMID: 34644417 PMC: 8941674. DOI: 10.1002/jts.22741.


The relationship between social support and mental health problems during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bedaso A, Adams J, Peng W, Sibbritt D Reprod Health. 2021; 18(1):162.

PMID: 34321040 PMC: 8320195. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01209-5.


References
1.
Stewart D, Ashraf I, Munce S . Women's mental health: a silent cause of mortality and morbidity. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006; 94(3):343-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.04.025. View

2.
Steer R, Scholl T, Hediger M, Fischer R . Self-reported depression and negative pregnancy outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992; 45(10):1093-9. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90149-h. View

3.
Farmer A, Katz R, McGuffin P, Bebbington P . A comparison between the Present State Examination and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987; 44(12):1064-8. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800240038006. View

4.
Hedegaard M, Henriksen T, Sabroe S, Secher N . Psychological distress in pregnancy and preterm delivery. BMJ. 1993; 307(6898):234-9. PMC: 1678180. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.307.6898.234. View

5.
Field T, Diego M, Hernandez-Reif M . Prenatal depression effects on the fetus and newborn: a review. Infant Behav Dev. 2006; 29(3):445-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.03.003. View