» Articles » PMID: 18762487

Characteristics That Distinguish Abusive from Nonabusive Head Trauma Among Young Children Who Underwent Head Computed Tomography in Japan

Overview
Journal Pediatrics
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2008 Sep 3
PMID 18762487
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Distinguishing abusive head trauma in young children from other diseases by symptoms is difficult in practice. Comparisons between abusive and nonabusive head trauma in young children in Japan, where computed tomography is widely and easily available, might contribute to identifying markers of abusive head trauma that differ from that in Western countries. The objective of this study was to compare the characteristics of abusive and nonabusive head trauma in young children in Japan.

Methods: A comparative case series study involving a retrospective medical chart and social work record review of children who were aged 0 to 2 years, visited the National Center for Child Health and Development (Tokyo, Japan) from March 1, 2002, to December 31, 2005, and underwent computed tomography scanning because of suspected intracranial injury was performed. Patients (N = 260) were identified and classified as having either abusive or nonabusive head trauma on the basis of the published definition. Demographic and perinatal characteristics, injury history, clinical presentation, and outcomes were compared by using chi2 and Fisher's exact tests.

Results: Patients with abusive head trauma were significantly younger than patients with nonabusive head trauma and had a peak at approximately 2 to 4 and 7 to 9 months. Patients with abusive head trauma more likely presented no injury history by the caregiver, neurologic symptoms (unconsciousness, seizure, paralysis), subdural hemorrhage, and retinal hemorrhages. Although patients with abusive head trauma had severe clinical outcomes, only 32% of them were separated from the caregiver by social welfare services.

Conclusions: This study highlights the several clinical markers to detect abusive head trauma at a medical visit, including an absence of injury history, neurologic symptoms, subdural hemorrhage, and retinal hemorrhage. These markers can be used to detect abusive head trauma cases by physicians and social welfare workers to protect children from additional abuse.

Citing Articles

Maternal, prenatal and postnatal risk factors for early child physical abuse: a French nationwide cohort study.

Blangis F, Drouin J, Launay E, Miranda S, Zureik M, Cohen J Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024; 42:100921.

PMID: 39070743 PMC: 11281928. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100921.


New Insights into the Diagnosis and Age Determination of Retinal Hemorrhages from Abusive Head Trauma: A Systematic Review.

Di Fazio N, Delogu G, Morena D, Cipolloni L, Scopetti M, Mazzilli S Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(10).

PMID: 37238204 PMC: 10217069. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13101722.


The monthly incidence of abusive head trauma, inflicted skeletal trauma, and unexplained skin lesion in children in six French university hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Obry S, Roman E, Tavernier E, Boutry N, Delval A, Blouet M Child Abuse Negl. 2023; 138:106063.

PMID: 36758374 PMC: 9884623. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106063.


Abusive Head Trauma in Infants During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Paris Metropolitan Area.

Lazarescu A, Benichi S, Blauwblomme T, Beccaria K, Bourgeois M, Roux C JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(8):e2226182.

PMID: 36040743 PMC: 9428740. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.26182.


Infantile subdural hematoma in Japan: A multicenter, retrospective study by the J-HITs (Japanese head injury of infants and toddlers study) group.

Akutsu N, Nonaka M, Narisawa A, Kato M, Harada A, Park Y PLoS One. 2022; 17(2):e0264396.

PMID: 35213611 PMC: 8880432. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264396.