» Articles » PMID: 1875286

Designs for Population Pharmacodynamics: Value of Pharmacokinetic Data and Population Analysis

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1991 Jun 1
PMID 1875286
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Analyses of simulated data from pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies varying with respect to the amount and timing of observations were undertaken to assess the value of these design choices. The simulation models assume mono- or biexponential drug disposition, and Emax-type pharmacodynamics. Data analysis uses a combined PK/PD population analysis or a hybrid, individual-PK/population-PD analysis. Assuming that the goal of the PK/PD studies is to estimate population PD, performance of designs is judged by comparing the precision of estimates of population mean PD parameters and of their interindividual variability. The simulations reveal that (i) PK data, even in small number (2 points per person from as few as 25-50% of persons) are very valuable for estimating population PD; (ii) designs involving more individuals, even if many are sparsely sampled, dominate designs calling for more complete study of fewer persons; (iii) the population analysis is generally superior to the hybrid analysis, especially when the PK model is misspecified (biexponential assumed to be monoexponential for analysis); (iv) varying sampling times and doses among subjects protects against the ill effects of model misspecification. In general, the results are quite encouraging about the usefulness of sparse data designs to estimate population dose response.

Citing Articles

Optimal sample selection applied to information rich, dense data.

Wang D, Hung T, Hung N, Glue P, Jackson C, Duffull S J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2023; 51(1):33-37.

PMID: 37561265 DOI: 10.1007/s10928-023-09883-7.


A limited sampling strategy based on maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation for a five-probe phenotyping cocktail.

Nguyen T, Benech H, Pruvost A, Lenuzza N Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015; 72(1):39-51.

PMID: 26490357 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-015-1953-5.


Lewis Sheiner ISoP/UCSF Lecturer Award: From Drug Use to Statistical Models and Vice Versa.

Mentre F CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2014; 3:e154.

PMID: 25545685 PMC: 4288004. DOI: 10.1038/psp.2014.52.


Simultaneous optimal experimental design on dose and sample times.

Nyberg J, Karlsson M, Hooker A J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2009; 36(2):125-45.

PMID: 19319484 DOI: 10.1007/s10928-009-9114-z.


Optimisation of sampling windows design for population pharmacokinetic experiments.

Ogungbenro K, Aarons L J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2008; 35(4):465-82.

PMID: 18780163 DOI: 10.1007/s10928-008-9097-1.


References
1.
Sheiner L, Beal S . Evaluation of methods for estimating population pharmacokinetic parameters. III. Monoexponential model: routine clinical pharmacokinetic data. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1983; 11(3):303-19. DOI: 10.1007/BF01061870. View

2.
Kelman A, Whiting B . Experimental design and efficient parameter estimation in population pharmacokinetics. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1990; 18(4):347-60. DOI: 10.1007/BF01062273. View

3.
Sheiner L, Benet L . Premarketing observational studies of population pharmacokinetics of new drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1985; 38(5):481-7. DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1985.212. View

4.
Beal S . Population pharmacokinetic data and parameter estimation based on their first two statistical moments. Drug Metab Rev. 1984; 15(1-2):173-93. DOI: 10.3109/03602538409015064. View

5.
Verotta D, Sheiner L . Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: an improved algorithm. Comput Appl Biosci. 1987; 3(4):345-9. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/3.4.345. View