» Articles » PMID: 18751814

What is the Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Overview
Journal HSS J
Date 2008 Aug 30
PMID 18751814
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

MRI has been shown to be an extremely effective instrument in the management of painful hip arthroplasty. Its superior soft tissue contrast and direct multiplanar acquisition compared to computerized tomography (CT) and radiographs allows for reproducible visualization of periacetabular osteolysis, demonstrating compression of neurovascular bundles by extracapsular synovial deposits. In addition, MRI can often elucidate etiology of neuropathy in the perioperative period and is further helpful in evaluating the soft tissue envelope, including the attachment of the hip abductors, short external rotators and iliopsoas tendon. A further advantage of MRI over CT is its lack of ionizing radiation. Most importantly, MRI can disclose intracapsular synovial deposits that precede osteoclastic resorption of bone.

Citing Articles

The role of MRI in the diagnosis of aseptic loosening following total hip arthroplasty.

Ashkenazi I, Habibi A, Jacobi S, Aggarwal V, Schwarzkopf R, Rozell J Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(11):4989-4993.

PMID: 39313640 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05592-z.


Arthroscopic and endoscopic techniques for iliopsoas release in THA are safe and effective: a systematic review of the literature.

Giai Via R, Giachino M, Elzeiny A, Donis A, De Vivo S, Bosco F Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024; 34(6):2845-2857.

PMID: 38977435 PMC: 11377508. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-04042-1.


MRI of total hip arthroplasty: technical aspects and imaging findings.

Albano D, Pansa S, Messina C, Gitto S, Serpi F, Fusco S Insights Imaging. 2024; 15(1):152.

PMID: 38900339 PMC: 11189891. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01717-5.


Pelvic Roll Back Can Trigger Functional Psoas Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Sterneder C, Tungler T, Haralambiev L, Boettner C, Boettner F Arthroplast Today. 2024; 27:101375.

PMID: 38680848 PMC: 11047294. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101375.


Results after arthroscopic treatment of iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty.

Zimmerer A, Hauschild M, Nietschke R, Schneider M, Wassilew G, Sobau C Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020; 142(2):189-195.

PMID: 33044706 PMC: 8783918. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03623-z.


References
1.
Carlsson A, Gentz C . Radiographic versus clinical loosening of the acetabular component in noninfected total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984; (185):145-50. View

2.
Potter H, Montgomery K, Padgett D, Salvati E, Helfet D . Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis. New orthopaedic applications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; (319):223-31. View

3.
Potter H, Nestor B, Sofka C, Ho S, Peters L, Salvati E . Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86(9):1947-54. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200409000-00013. View

4.
Hozack W, Mesa J, Carey C, Rothman R . Relationship between polyethylene wear, pelvic osteolysis, and clinical symptomatology in patients with cementless acetabular components. A framework for decision making. J Arthroplasty. 1996; 11(7):769-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(96)80175-6. View

5.
Maus T, Berquist T, BENDER C, Rand J . Arthrographic study of painful total hip arthroplasty: refined criteria. Radiology. 1987; 162(3):721-7. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.162.3.3809486. View