» Articles » PMID: 18725829

Informed Decision-making and Colorectal Cancer Screening: is It Occurring in Primary Care?

Overview
Journal Med Care
Specialty Health Services
Date 2008 Sep 9
PMID 18725829
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Current recommendations advise patients to participate in the decision-making for selecting a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening option. The degree to which providers communicate the information necessary to prepare patients for participation in this process is not known.

Objective: To assess the level of informed decision-making occurring during actual patient-provider communications on CRC screening and test for the association between informed decision-making and screening behavior.

Research Design: Observational study of audiotaped clinic visits between patients and their providers in the primary care clinic at a Veterans Administration Medical Center.

Subjects: Male patients, age 50-74 years, presenting to a primary care visit at the study site.

Measures: The Informed Decision-Making (IDM) Model was used to code the audiotapes for 9 elements of communication that should occur to prepare patients for participation in decision-making. The primary outcome is completion of CRC screening during the study period.

Results: The analytic cohort consisted of 91 patients due for CRC screening who had a test ordered at the visit. Six of the 9 IDM elements occurred in < or =20% of the visits with none addressed in > or =50%. CRC screening occurred less frequently for those discussing "pros and cons" (12% vs. 46%, P = 0.01) and "patient preferences" (6% vs. 47%, P = 0.001) compared with those who did not.

Conclusions: We found that a lack of informed decision-making occurred during CRC screening discussions and that particular elements of the process were negatively associated with screening. Further research is needed to better understand the effects of informed decision-making on screening behavior.

Citing Articles

Talking, not training, increased the accuracy of physicians' diagnosis of their patients' preferences for colon cancer screening.

Valentine K, Leavitt L, Simmons L, Sepucha K, Atlas S, Korsen N Patient Educ Couns. 2023; 119:108047.

PMID: 37976668 PMC: 10841970. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108047.


Opportunities and Challenges When Using the Electronic Health Record for Practice-Integrated Patient-Facing Interventions: The e-Assist Colon Health Randomized Trial.

Lafata J, Shires D, Shin Y, Flocke S, Resnicow K, Johnson M Med Decis Making. 2022; 42(8):985-998.

PMID: 35762832 PMC: 9583291. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X221104094.


Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing a Digital Informed Decision Making Tool in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.

Puccinelli-Ortega N, Cromo M, Foley K, Dignan M, Dharod A, Snavely A Appl Clin Inform. 2022; 13(1):1-9.

PMID: 34986491 PMC: 8731240. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740481.


Lower Adherence: A Description of Colorectal Cancer Screening Barrier Talk.

Shen M, Lafata J, DAgostino T, Bylund C J Health Commun. 2019; 25(1):43-53.

PMID: 31795843 PMC: 6981046. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2019.1697909.


Patient-Reported Needs Following a Referral for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Dyer K, Shires D, Flocke S, Hawley S, Jones R, Resnicow K Am J Prev Med. 2018; 56(2):271-280.

PMID: 30554975 PMC: 6438715. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.08.017.