» Articles » PMID: 18721713

Intacs Implantation Using a Femtosecond Laser for Management of Keratoconus: Comparison of 306 Cases in Different Stages

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2008 Aug 30
PMID 18721713
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of intrastromal ring segment (Intacs, Addition Technology, Inc.) implantation and analyze outcomes according to different keratoconus stages.

Setting: Kudret Eye Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Method: In this retrospective noncomparative case series, 306 keratoconic eyes of 255 patients who had Intacs segment implantation were reviewed. Patients were grouped according to the Amsler-Krumeich keratoconus classification (stage II, 155 eyes; stage III, 83 eyes; stage IV, 68 eyes). The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal curvature, spherical and cylindrical manifest refractions, and central corneal thickness were analyzed and compared according to keratoconus stage.

Results: At a mean follow-up of 10.39 months +/- 5.04 (SD), the BCVA improved in 71.6% of eyes and the UCVA improved in 75.7% of eyes. The mean keratometry (K) decreased from 50.7 diopters (D) to 47.9 D (P<.05); the mean manifest spherical refraction, from -6.04 D to -3.09 D (P<.05); and the mean manifest cylindrical refraction, from -4.11 D to -3.82 D (P>.05). The changes in BCVA and manifest spherical and cylindrical refractions were not statistically different between the different keratoconus stages (P >.05). There was less change in UCVA and more improvement in the mean K value after Intacs treatment in stage IV than in the other stages (P<.05, analysis of variance).

Conclusions: Intacs treatment with a femtosecond laser was effective for management of keratoconus of all stages. Improvement in UCVA may be less in severe keratoconus than in moderate keratoconus.

Citing Articles

Criteria for patient selection and indication for intracorneal ring segments in keratoconus.

Vega A, Alio J Eye Vis (Lond). 2024; 11(1):13.

PMID: 38528633 PMC: 10964652. DOI: 10.1186/s40662-024-00379-0.


Tear proteome profile in eyes with keratoconus after intracorneal ring segment implantation or corneal crosslinking.

Goni N, Martinez-Soroa I, Ibarrondo O, Azkargorta M, Elortza F, Galarreta D Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:944504.

PMID: 36203781 PMC: 9531826. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.944504.


Comparison of penetrating femtosecond laser-assisted astigmatic keratotomy and toric intraocular lens implantation for correction of astigmatism in cataract surgery.

Noh H, Yoo Y, Shin K, Lim D, Chung T Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):7340.

PMID: 33795782 PMC: 8016891. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86763-5.


Intracorneal ring segments followed by toric pseudoaccomodating IOL for treatment of patients with corneal ectasia and cataract.

Konda S, Ambati B Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2020; 18:100693.

PMID: 32368687 PMC: 7184316. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100693.


Intracorneal Ring Segment Implantation in the Management of Keratoconus: An Evidence-Based Approach.

Sakellaris D, Balidis M, Gorou O, Szentmary N, Alexoudis A, Grieshaber M Ophthalmol Ther. 2019; 8(Suppl 1):5-14.

PMID: 31605316 PMC: 6789055. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-019-00211-2.