» Articles » PMID: 18715516

Can the Feedback of Patient Assessments, Brief Training, or Their Combination, Improve the Interpersonal Skills of Primary Care Physicians? A Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2008 Aug 22
PMID 18715516
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Improving quality of primary care is a key focus of international health policy. Current quality improvement efforts place a large focus on technical, clinical aspects of quality, but a comprehensive approach to quality improvement should also include interpersonal care. Two methods of improving the quality of interpersonal care in primary care have been proposed. One involves the feedback of patient assessments of interpersonal care to physicians, and the other involves brief training and education programmes. This study therefore reviewed the efficacy of (i) feedback of real patient assessments of interpersonal care skills, (ii) brief training focused on the improvement of interpersonal care (iii) interventions combining both (i) and (ii)

Methods: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Three electronic databases were searched (CENTRAL, Medline and Embase) and augmented by searches of the bibliographies of retrieved articles. The quality of studies was appraised and results summarised in narrative form.

Results: Nine studies were included (two patient based feedback studies and seven brief training studies). Of the two feedback studies, one reported a significant positive effect. Only one training study reported a significant positive effect.

Conclusion: There is limited evidence concerning the effects of patient based feedback. There is reasonable evidence that brief training as currently delivered is not effective, although the evidence is not definitive, due to the small number of trials and the variation in the training methods and goals. The lack of effectiveness of these methods may reflect a number of issues, such as differences in the effectiveness of the interventions in experienced practitioners and those in training, the lack of theory linking feedback to behaviour change, failure to provide sufficient training or to use a comprehensive range of behaviour change techniques. Further research into both feedback and brief training interventions is required before these interventions are routinely introduced to improve patient satisfaction with interpersonal care in primary care. The interventions to be tested in future research should consider using insights from the wider literature on communication outside primary care, might benefit from a clearer theoretical basis, and should examine the use of combined brief training and feedback.

Citing Articles

An Ethics Action Plan for Rare Disease Care: Participatory Action Research Approach.

Quintal A, Carreau I, Grenier A, Hebert C, Yergeau C, Berthiaume Y J Particip Med. 2023; 15:e46607.

PMID: 37995128 PMC: 10704333. DOI: 10.2196/46607.


Patient feedback on hospital pharmacists' consultation skills: A feasibility study using the Interpersonal Skills Questionnaire (ISQ).

Al-Jabr H, Twigg M, Katangwe-Chigamba T, Saadvandi R, Desborough J PLoS One. 2022; 17(7):e0268544.

PMID: 35834530 PMC: 9282534. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268544.


Review of 128 quality of care mechanisms: A framework and mapping for health system stewards.

Tello J, Barbazza E, Waddell K Health Policy. 2019; 124(1):12-24.

PMID: 31791717 PMC: 6946442. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.11.006.


Outcomes and outcome measures used in evaluation of communication training in oncology - a systematic literature review, an expert workshop, and recommendations for future research.

Fischer F, Helmer S, Rogge A, Arraras J, Buchholz A, Hannawa A BMC Cancer. 2019; 19(1):808.

PMID: 31412805 PMC: 6694634. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6022-5.


Patients' perspective on how to improve the care of people with chronic conditions in France: a citizen science study within the ComPaRe e-cohort.

Tran V, Riveros C, Pean C, Czarnobroda A, Ravaud P BMJ Qual Saf. 2019; 28(11):875-886.

PMID: 31015376 PMC: 6860767. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008593.


References
1.
Goodpastor W, Montoya I . Motivating physician behaviour change: social influence versus financial contingencies. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 1995; 9(6):4-9. DOI: 10.1108/09526869610128214. View

2.
Middleton J, McKinley R, Gillies C . Effect of patient completed agenda forms and doctors' education about the agenda on the outcome of consultations: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2006; 332(7552):1238-42. PMC: 1471934. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38841.444861.7C. View

3.
Freudenstein U, Howe A . Recommendations for future studies: a systematic review of educational interventions in primary care settings. Br J Gen Pract. 2000; 49(449):995-1001. PMC: 1313589. View

4.
Brown J, Boles M, Mullooly J, Levinson W . Effect of clinician communication skills training on patient satisfaction. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1999; 131(11):822-9. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-131-11-199912070-00004. View

5.
Greco M, Brownlea A, McGovern J . Impact of patient feedback on the interpersonal skills of general practice registrars: results of a longitudinal study. Med Educ. 2001; 35(8):748-56. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00976.x. View