» Articles » PMID: 18700008

In Vivo Quantification of Embryonic and Placental Growth During Gestation in Mice Using Micro-ultrasound

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2008 Aug 14
PMID 18700008
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Non-invasive micro-ultrasound was evaluated as a method to quantify intrauterine growth phenotypes in mice. Improved methods are required to accelerate research using genetically-altered mice to investigate the interactive roles of genes and environments on embryonic and placental growth. We determined (1) feasible age ranges for measuring specific variables, (2) normative growth curves, (3) accuracy of ultrasound measurements in comparison with light microscopy, and (4) weight prediction equations using regression analysis for CD-1 mice and evaluated their accuracy when applied to other mouse strains.

Methods: We used 30-40 MHz ultrasound to quantify embryonic and placental morphometry in isoflurane-anesthetized pregnant CD-1 mice from embryonic day 7.5 (E7.5) to E18.5 (full-term), and for C57Bl/6J, B6CBAF1, and hIGFBP1 pregnant transgenic mice at E17.5.

Results: Gestational sac dimension provided the earliest measure of conceptus size. Sac dimension derived using regression analysis increased from 0.84 mm at E7.5 to 6.44 mm at E11.5 when it was discontinued. The earliest measurement of embryo size was crown-rump length (CRL) which increased from 1.88 mm at E8.5 to 16.22 mm at E16.5 after which it exceeded the field of view. From E10.5 to E18.5 (full term), progressive increases were observed in embryonic biparietal diameter (BPD) (0.79 mm to 7.55 mm at E18.5), abdominal circumference (AC) (4.91 mm to 26.56 mm), and eye lens diameter (0.20 mm to 0.93 mm). Ossified femur length was measureable from E15.5 (1.06 mm) and increased linearly to 2.23 mm at E18.5. In contrast, placental diameter (PD) and placental thickness (PT) increased from E10.5 to E14.5 then remained constant to term in accord with placental weight. Ultrasound and light microscopy measurements agreed with no significant bias and a discrepancy of less than 25%. Regression equations predicting gestational age from individual variables, and embryonic weight (BW) from CRL, BPD, and AC were obtained. The prediction equation BW = -0.757 + 0.0453 (CRL) + 0.0334 (AC) derived from CD-1 data predicted embryonic weights at E17.5 in three other strains of mice with a mean discrepancy of less than 16%.

Conclusion: Micro-ultrasound provides a feasible tool for in vivo morphometric quantification of embryonic and placental growth parameters in mice and for estimation of embryonic gestational age and/or body weight in utero.

Citing Articles

Combinatorial genetic manipulation of Cx50, PI3K and PTEN alters postnatal mouse lens growth and homeostasis.

Sellitto C, White T Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2025; 5:1502836.

PMID: 40046897 PMC: 11879993. DOI: 10.3389/fopht.2025.1502836.


Three-dimensional diffractive acoustic tomography.

Menozzi L, Vu T, Canning A, Rawtani H, Taboada C, Abi Antoun M Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1149.

PMID: 39880853 PMC: 11779832. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56435-3.


Preexisting vaccine-primed heterosubtypic T cell immunity protects the maternal-fetal unit from adverse influenza outcomes in mice.

Flores Malavet V, Dhume K, Satchmei A, Arvelo A, Beaird A, Annamalai S J Clin Invest. 2025; 135(1).

PMID: 39744951 PMC: 11684801. DOI: 10.1172/JCI179230.


Safety of embryo cryopreservation: insights from mid-term placental transcriptional changes.

Luo Q, Zhang S, Wu H, Mo J, Yu J, He R Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024; 22(1):80.

PMID: 38997724 PMC: 11241961. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-024-01241-7.


Obesogenic diet in pregnancy disrupts placental iron handling and ferroptosis and stress signalling in association with fetal growth alterations.

Zaugg J, Lopez-Tello J, Musial B, Vaughan O, Fowden A, Albrecht C Cell Mol Life Sci. 2024; 81(1):151.

PMID: 38526599 PMC: 10963579. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-024-05192-5.


References
1.
Spurney C, Lo C, Leatherbury L . Fetal mouse imaging using echocardiography: a review of current technology. Echocardiography. 2006; 23(10):891-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2006.00335.x. View

2.
Rossant J, CROSS J . Placental development: lessons from mouse mutants. Nat Rev Genet. 2001; 2(7):538-48. DOI: 10.1038/35080570. View

3.
Knight B, Pennell C, Adamson S, Lye S . The impact of murine strain and sex on postnatal development after maternal dietary restriction during pregnancy. J Physiol. 2007; 581(Pt 2):873-81. PMC: 2075185. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.126573. View

4.
Church C, Miller M . Quantification of risk from fetal exposure to diagnostic ultrasound. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2006; 93(1-3):331-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.07.015. View

5.
Charalambous M, da Rocha S, Ferguson-Smith A . Genomic imprinting, growth control and the allocation of nutritional resources: consequences for postnatal life. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2007; 14(1):3-12. DOI: 10.1097/MED.0b013e328013daa2. View