» Articles » PMID: 18686764

36-month Clinical Evaluation of Two Adhesives and Microhybrid Resin Composites in Class I Restorations

Overview
Journal Am J Dent
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2008 Aug 9
PMID 18686764
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive with that of a popular etch-and-rinse adhesive in Class I posterior composite restorations.

Methods: 60 Class I resin composite restorations (30 per group) were placed in matched pairs using either the self-etch adhesive Xeno III and the microhybrid resin composite Esthet-X or the etch-and-rinse adhesive OptiBond Solo Plus and Point 4 microhybrid resin composite. Subjects were interviewed via telephone 1 week after restoration placement to assess early post-operative sensitivity. In addition, the restorations were evaluated clinically for post-operative sensitivity, marginal quality, wear, and other characteristics immediately after placement and at 6, 12, 18, and 36 months from baseline.

Results: During the first week after placement, subjects reported that 23% of restorations in each group had post-operative sensitivity. Sensitivity decreased greatly with time, and differences between the two groups were never statistically significant. Marginal integrity and discoloration were similar for each group at each recall evaluation. Wear of both resin composites increased over time, but mean wear remained at less than 100 microm for each resin composite at 3 years.

Citing Articles

Influence of Cavity Lining on the 3-Year Clinical Outcome of Posterior Composite Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Nguyen A, Putz N, Michaelis M, Bitter K, Gernhardt C Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(5).

PMID: 38786526 PMC: 11120593. DOI: 10.3390/dj12050128.


Effect of different adhesive systems on dental defects and sensitivity to teeth in composite resin restoration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fang K, Chen K, Shi M, Wang L Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 27(6):2495-2511.

PMID: 37017757 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05007-0.


Compliance of randomized controlled trials in posterior restorations with the CONSORT statement: a systematic review of methodology.

Rezende M, Martins A, da Silva J, Reis A, de Geus J Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 26(1):41-64.

PMID: 34595606 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04198-8.


Knowledge and Attitudes of Dentists toward Adhesive System Selection: A Cross-sectional Study from Palestine.

Arandi N, Thabet M J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020; 10(1):107-115.

PMID: 32181228 PMC: 7055343. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_385_19.


Influence of different application protocols of universal adhesive system on the clinical behavior of Class I and II restorations of composite resin - a randomized and double-blind controlled clinical trial.

Carvalho A, Leite M, Zago J, Nunes C, Barata T, Freitas G BMC Oral Health. 2019; 19(1):252.

PMID: 31752813 PMC: 6868695. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0913-3.