» Articles » PMID: 18683008

Management of Preoperatively Suspected Choledocholithiasis: a Decision Analysis

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2008 Aug 7
PMID 18683008
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The management of symptomatic or incidentally discovered common bile duct (CBD) stones is still controversial. Of patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis, 5-15% will also harbor CBD stones, and those with symptoms suggestive of choledocholithiasis will have an even higher incidence. Options for treatment include preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy (ERCP/ES) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiogram (LC/IOC), followed by either laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) or placement of a common bile duct double-lumen catheter with postoperative management. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the optimal management of such patients.

Methods: A decision analysis was performed to analyze the management of patients with suspected common bile duct stones. The basic choice was between preoperative ERCP/ES followed by LC, LC/IOC followed by LCBDE, or common duct double-lumen catheter (Fitzgibbons tube) placement with either expectant management or postoperative ERCP/ES. Data on morbidity and mortality was obtained from the literature. Sensitivity analysis was done varying the incidence of positive CBD stones on IOC with associated morbidity and mortality.

Results: One-stage management of symptomatic CBD stones with LC/LCBDE is associated with less morbidity and mortality (7% and 0.19%) than two-stage management utilizing preoperative ERCP/ES (13.5% and 0.5%). Sensitivity analysis shows that there is an increase in morbidity and mortality for LC/LCBDE as the incidence of positive IOC increases but are still less than two-stage management even with a 100% positive IOC (9.4%, 0.5%). If a double-lumen catheter is to be used for positive IOC, the morbidity would be higher than two-stage management only if the positive IOC incidence is more than 65% but still with no mortality.

Conclusion: LCBDE has lower morbidity and mortality rates compared to preoperative ERCP/ES in the management of patients with suspected CBD stones even if the chance of CBD stones reaches 100%. Using a common duct double-lumen catheter may be considered if LCBDE is not feasible and the chance of CBD stone is less than 65%.

Citing Articles

Is there a role for routine intraoperative cholangiogram in diagnosing CBD stones in patients with normal liver function tests? A prospective study.

Lim Y, Leow V, Koong J, Subramaniam M Innov Surg Sci. 2024; 9(1):37-45.

PMID: 38826633 PMC: 11138406. DOI: 10.1515/iss-2023-0059.


Comparing One-Stage vs Two-Stage Approaches for the Management of Choledocholithiasis.

Kattih O, Velanovich V J Gastrointest Surg. 2022; 27(3):534-543.

PMID: 36127555 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05458-y.


Routine intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: application of the 2016 WSES guidelines for predicting choledocholithiasis.

Lai H, Tsai K, Chen H Surg Endosc. 2021; 36(1):461-467.

PMID: 33523267 PMC: 8741698. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08305-4.


Comparison on the Efficacy of Three Duct Closure Methods after Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis.

Qin A, Wu J, Qiao Z, Zhai M, Lu Y, Huang B Med Sci Monit. 2019; 25:9770-9775.

PMID: 31857570 PMC: 6935246. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.918743.


Consequences of Stenting and Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilatation in Treatment of Large and Multiple Common Bile Duct Stones.

Hormati A, Ghadir M, Hasanpour Dehkordi A, Yadollahi F, Salehitali S, Afifian M Middle East J Dig Dis. 2019; 11(4):205-210.

PMID: 31824623 PMC: 6895848. DOI: 10.15171/mejdd.2019.150.


References
1.
Chang L, Lo S, Stabile B, Lewis R, Toosie K, de Virgilio C . Preoperative versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in mild to moderate gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2000; 231(1):82-7. PMC: 1420969. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200001000-00012. View

2.
Fitzgibbons Jr R, Ryberg A, Ulualp K, Nguyen N, Litke B, Camps J . An alternative technique for treatment of choledocholithiasis found at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 1995; 130(6):638-42. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430060076014. View

3.
Enochsson L, Lindberg B, Swahn F, Arnelo U . Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to remove common bile duct stones during routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not prolong hospitalization: a 2-year experience. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18(3):367-71. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-9021-0. View

4.
Sarli L, Pietra N, Franze A, COLLA G, Costi R, Gobbi S . Routine intravenous cholangiography, selective ERCP, and endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999; 50(2):200-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70225-7. View

5.
Acosta J, Katkhouda N, Debian K, Groshen S, Tsao-Wei D, Berne T . Early ductal decompression versus conservative management for gallstone pancreatitis with ampullary obstruction: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2005; 243(1):33-40. PMC: 1449963. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000194086.22580.92. View