Survival of the Sparsest: Robust Gene Networks Are Parsimonious

Overview

Journal Mol Syst Biol

Specialty Molecular Biology

Date 2008 Aug 7

PMID 18682703

Citations 88

Authors

Robert D Leclerc

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Biological gene networks appear to be dynamically robust to mutation, stochasticity, and changes in the environment and also appear to be sparsely connected. Studies with computational models, however, have suggested that denser gene networks evolve to be more dynamically robust than sparser networks. We resolve this discrepancy by showing that misassumptions about how to measure robustness in artificial networks have inadvertently discounted the costs of network complexity. We show that when the costs of complexity are taken into account, that robustness implies a parsimonious network structure that is sparsely connected and not unnecessarily complex; and that selection will favor sparse networks when network topology is free to evolve. Because a robust system of heredity is necessary for the adaptive evolution of complex phenotypes, the maintenance of frugal network complexity is likely a crucial design constraint that underlies biological organization.

Citing Articles

GUEST: an R package for handling estimation of graphical structure and multiclassification for error-prone gene expression data.

Chen L, Tsao H Bioinformatics. 2024; 40(12).

PMID: 39660781 PMC: 11655624. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae731.

Effects of simulated low-temperature thermal remediation on the microbial community of a tropical creosote contaminated soil.

Penna D, Merzel V, de Freitas J, Martinez K, Barbosa A, Nakayama C Braz J Microbiol. 2024; 55(4):3413-3424.

PMID: 39412603 PMC: 11711421. DOI: 10.1007/s42770-024-01541-5.

Bayesian inference of sample-specific coexpression networks.

Saha E, Fanfani V, Mandros P, Ben Guebila M, Fischer J, Shutta K Genome Res. 2024; 34(9):1397-1410.

PMID: 39134413 PMC: 11529861. DOI: 10.1101/gr.279117.124.

Optimizing data integration improves gene regulatory network inference in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Cassan O, Lecellier C, Martin A, Brehelin L, Lebre S Bioinformatics. 2024; 40(7).

PMID: 38913855 PMC: 11227367. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae415.

A Bayesian approach to differential edges with probabilistic interactions: applications in association and classification.

Huang Y, Lai Y, Hsiao C Bioinform Adv. 2023; 3(1):vbad172.

PMID: 38089111 PMC: 10713123. DOI: 10.1093/bioadv/vbad172.

References

Siegal M, Bergman A . Waddington's canalization revisited: developmental stability and evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(16):10528-32. PMC: 124963. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.102303999. View

MacCarthy T, Bergman A . Coevolution of robustness, epistasis, and recombination favors asexual reproduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(31):12801-6. PMC: 1931480. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0705455104. View

Bergman A, Siegal M . Evolutionary capacitance as a general feature of complex gene networks. Nature. 2003; 424(6948):549-52. DOI: 10.1038/nature01765. View

Sole R, Fernandez P, Kauffman S . Adaptive walks in a gene network model of morphogenesis: insights into the Cambrian explosion. Int J Dev Biol. 2004; 47(7-8):685-93. View

Noman N, Iba H . Reverse engineering genetic networks using evolutionary computation. Genome Inform. 2006; 16(2):205-14. View

Polo S, Almouzni G . Chromatin assembly: a basic recipe with various flavours. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006; 16(2):104-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2006.02.011. View

Zilberman D, Gehring M, Tran R, Ballinger T, Henikoff S . Genome-wide analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methylation uncovers an interdependence between methylation and transcription. Nat Genet. 2006; 39(1):61-9. DOI: 10.1038/ng1929. View

Huerta-Sanchez E, Durrett R . Wagner's canalization model. Theor Popul Biol. 2006; 71(2):121-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2006.10.006. View

Ciliberti S, Martin O, Wagner A . Robustness can evolve gradually in complex regulatory gene networks with varying topology. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007; 3(2):e15. PMC: 1794322. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030015. View

10.

Azevedo R, Lohaus R, Srinivasan S, Dang K, Burch C . Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks. Nature. 2006; 440(7080):87-90. DOI: 10.1038/nature04488. View

11.

Mattick J . RNA regulation: a new genetics?. Nat Rev Genet. 2004; 5(4):316-23. DOI: 10.1038/nrg1321. View

12.

Kondrashov A . Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature. 1988; 336(6198):435-40. DOI: 10.1038/336435a0. View

13.

Martin O, Wagner A . Multifunctionality and robustness trade-offs in model genetic circuits. Biophys J. 2008; 94(8):2927-37. PMC: 2275717. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.114348. View

14.

Masel J . Genetic assimilation can occur in the absence of selection for the assimilating phenotype, suggesting a role for the canalization heuristic. J Evol Biol. 2004; 17(5):1106-10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00739.x. View

15.

LEWIS E . A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature. 1978; 276(5688):565-70. DOI: 10.1038/276565a0. View

16.

Wagner A . DOES EVOLUTIONARY PLASTICITY EVOLVE?. Evolution. 2017; 50(3):1008-1023. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb02342.x. View

17.

Salazar-Ciudad I, Garcia-Fernandez J, Sole R . Gene networks capable of pattern formation: from induction to reaction-diffusion. J Theor Biol. 2000; 205(4):587-603. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2092. View

18.

Siegal M, Promislow D, Bergman A . Functional and evolutionary inference in gene networks: does topology matter?. Genetica. 2006; 129(1):83-103. DOI: 10.1007/s10709-006-0035-0. View

19.

Ciliberti S, Martin O, Wagner A . Innovation and robustness in complex regulatory gene networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(34):13591-6. PMC: 1959426. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0705396104. View

20.

MacCarthy T, Bergman A . The limits of subfunctionalization. BMC Evol Biol. 2007; 7:213. PMC: 2213666. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-213. View