» Articles » PMID: 18681992

Highly Purified HMG Versus Recombinant FSH for Ovarian Stimulation in IVF Cycles

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2008 Aug 7
PMID 18681992
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the live birth rates resulting from ovarian stimulation with highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin (HP-HMG), which combines FSH and human chorionic gonadotrophin-driven LH activities, or recombinant FSH (rFSH) alone in women undergoing IVF cycles. An integrated analysis was performed of the raw data from two randomized controlled trials that were highly comparable in terms of eligibility criteria and post-randomization treatment regimens with either HP-HMG or rFSH for ovarian stimulation in IVF, following a long down-regulation protocol. All randomized subjects who received at least one dose of gonadotrophin in an IVF cycle (HP-HMG, n = 491; rFSH, n = 495) were included in the analysis. Subjects who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles were excluded. The superiority of one gonadotrophin preparation over the other was tested using the likelihood ratio test in a logistic regression analysis. The live birth rate per cycle initiated was 26.5% (130/491) with HP-HMG and 20.8% (103/495) with rFSH (P = 0.041). The odds ratio in favour of HP-HMG was 1.36 (95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.83). Thus, the findings of this integrated analysis demonstrate that ovarian stimulation with HP-HMG, following a long down-regulation protocol, in IVF cycles results in significantly more live births than stimulation with rFSH alone.

Citing Articles

Interplay Between mTOR and Hippo Signaling in the Ovary: Clinical Choice Guidance Between Different Gonadotropin Preparations for Better IVF.

Papageorgiou K, Mastora E, Zikopoulos A, Grigoriou M, Georgiou I, Michaelidis T Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021; 12:702446.

PMID: 34367070 PMC: 8334720. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.702446.


Gonadotropin versus Follicle-Stimulating Hormone for Ovarian Response in Patients Undergoing in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Comparison.

Ji Z, Quan X, Lan Y, Zhao M, Tian X, Yang X Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2020; 92:100572.

PMID: 31908689 PMC: 6940711. DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2019.100572.


The ratio of exogenous Luteinizing hormone to Follicle stimulating hormone administered for controlled ovarian stimulation is associated with oocytes' number and competence.

Albu D, Albu A Biosci Rep. 2019; 40(1).

PMID: 31850491 PMC: 6944660. DOI: 10.1042/BSR20190811.


A Comparison of Outcomes from Fertilization Cycles Stimulated with Follicle Stimulating Hormone Plus either Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone or Human Menopausal Gonadotropins in Subjects Treated with Long Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonist....

Bleau N, Agdi M, Son W, Tan S, Dahan M Int J Fertil Steril. 2017; 11(2):79-84.

PMID: 28670424 PMC: 5347454. DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2017.4759.


Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin.

Requena A, Cruz M, Ruiz F, Garcia-Velasco J Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014; 12:10.

PMID: 24476504 PMC: 3907361. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-10.