» Articles » PMID: 18681610

Cue-specific Effects of Categorization Training on the Relative Weighting of Acoustic Cues to Consonant Voicing in English

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2008 Aug 7
PMID 18681610
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In English, voiced and voiceless syllable-initial stop consonants differ in both fundamental frequency at the onset of voicing (onset F0) and voice onset time (VOT). Although both correlates, alone, can cue the voicing contrast, listeners weight VOT more heavily when both are available. Such differential weighting may arise from differences in the perceptual distance between voicing categories along the VOT versus onset F0 dimensions, or it may arise from a bias to pay more attention to VOT than to onset F0. The present experiment examines listeners' use of these two cues when classifying stimuli in which perceptual distance was artificially equated along the two dimensions. Listeners were also trained to categorize stimuli based on one cue at the expense of another. Equating perceptual distance eliminated the expected bias toward VOT before training, but successfully learning to base decisions more on VOT and less on onset F0 was easier than vice versa. Perceptual distance along both dimensions increased for both groups after training, but only VOT-trained listeners showed a decrease in Garner interference. Results lend qualified support to an attentional model of phonetic learning in which learning involves strategic redeployment of selective attention across integral acoustic cues.

Citing Articles

Extensive residence in a second language environment modifies perceptual strategies for suprasegmental categorization.

Petrova K, Jasmin K, Saito K, Tierney A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023; 49(12):1943-1955.

PMID: 38127498 PMC: 10734206. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001246.


Informational masking influences segmental and suprasegmental speech categorization.

Symons A, Holt L, Tierney A Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 31(2):686-696.

PMID: 37658222 PMC: 11061029. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02364-5.


Statistical learning across passive listening adjusts perceptual weights of speech input dimensions.

Hodson A, Shinn-Cunningham B, Holt L Cognition. 2023; 238:105473.

PMID: 37210878 PMC: 11380765. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105473.


Integration of fundamental frequency and voice-onset-time to voicing categorization: Listeners with normal hearing and bimodal hearing configurations.

Buz E, Dwyer N, Lai W, Watson D, Gifford R J Acoust Soc Am. 2023; 153(3):1580.

PMID: 37002096 PMC: 9995168. DOI: 10.1121/10.0017429.


Speakers monitor auditory feedback for temporal alignment and linguistically relevant duration.

Karlin R, Parrell B J Acoust Soc Am. 2022; 152(6):3142.

PMID: 36586849 PMC: 9719414. DOI: 10.1121/10.0015247.


References
1.
Goldstone R . Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1994; 123(2):178-200. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.123.2.178. View

2.
Lutfi R, Liu C . Individual differences in source identification from synthesized impact sounds. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007; 122(2):1017-28. DOI: 10.1121/1.2751269. View

3.
Macmillan N, Kingston J, Thorburn R, Dickey L, Bartels C . Integrality of nasalization and F1. II. Basic sensitivity and phonetic labeling measure distinct sensory and decision-rule interactions. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999; 106(5):2913-32. DOI: 10.1121/1.428113. View

4.
Kingston J, Macmillan N, Dickey L, Thorburn R, Bartels C . Integrality in the perception of tongue root position and voice quality in vowels. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997; 101(3):1696-709. DOI: 10.1121/1.418179. View

5.
Abramson A . Laryngeal timing in consonant distinctions. Phonetica. 1977; 34(4):295-303. DOI: 10.1159/000259888. View