Cue-specific Effects of Categorization Training on the Relative Weighting of Acoustic Cues to Consonant Voicing in English
Overview
Affiliations
In English, voiced and voiceless syllable-initial stop consonants differ in both fundamental frequency at the onset of voicing (onset F0) and voice onset time (VOT). Although both correlates, alone, can cue the voicing contrast, listeners weight VOT more heavily when both are available. Such differential weighting may arise from differences in the perceptual distance between voicing categories along the VOT versus onset F0 dimensions, or it may arise from a bias to pay more attention to VOT than to onset F0. The present experiment examines listeners' use of these two cues when classifying stimuli in which perceptual distance was artificially equated along the two dimensions. Listeners were also trained to categorize stimuli based on one cue at the expense of another. Equating perceptual distance eliminated the expected bias toward VOT before training, but successfully learning to base decisions more on VOT and less on onset F0 was easier than vice versa. Perceptual distance along both dimensions increased for both groups after training, but only VOT-trained listeners showed a decrease in Garner interference. Results lend qualified support to an attentional model of phonetic learning in which learning involves strategic redeployment of selective attention across integral acoustic cues.
Petrova K, Jasmin K, Saito K, Tierney A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023; 49(12):1943-1955.
PMID: 38127498 PMC: 10734206. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001246.
Informational masking influences segmental and suprasegmental speech categorization.
Symons A, Holt L, Tierney A Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 31(2):686-696.
PMID: 37658222 PMC: 11061029. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02364-5.
Statistical learning across passive listening adjusts perceptual weights of speech input dimensions.
Hodson A, Shinn-Cunningham B, Holt L Cognition. 2023; 238:105473.
PMID: 37210878 PMC: 11380765. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105473.
Buz E, Dwyer N, Lai W, Watson D, Gifford R J Acoust Soc Am. 2023; 153(3):1580.
PMID: 37002096 PMC: 9995168. DOI: 10.1121/10.0017429.
Speakers monitor auditory feedback for temporal alignment and linguistically relevant duration.
Karlin R, Parrell B J Acoust Soc Am. 2022; 152(6):3142.
PMID: 36586849 PMC: 9719414. DOI: 10.1121/10.0015247.