A Comparative Study of Stability After Mandibular Advancement Surgery
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The postsurgical stability of two groups of patients treated with different fixation techniques after mandibular advancement was evaluated retrospectively. Sixteen patients (group 1) underwent rigid osseous fixation, and another group of 16 patients (group 2) underwent intraosseous wiring fixation. Our findings suggested that skeletal and dental changes occurred in both groups as a result of adaptation to the altered functional equilibrium. Relapse resulting in a percentage loss of the initial advancement occurred primarily 6 to 8 weeks postsurgically. No statistically significant difference was found to exist in the short-term and long-term rates between the two groups. For the population studied, relative stability after mandibular advancement surgery was affected more by individual variability than by the fixation technique.
Eshghpour M, Shooshtari Z, Labafchi A, Radvar N, Tohidi E, Samieirad S World J Plast Surg. 2022; 11(1):51-58.
PMID: 35592233 PMC: 9018023. DOI: 10.52547/wjps.11.1.51.
Bempt M, Vinayahalingam S, Han M, Berge S, Xi T Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021; 25(1):1-13.
PMID: 33938136 PMC: 9292715. DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12488.
Torgersbraten N, Stenvik A, Espeland L Eur J Orthod. 2020; 43(2):215-221.
PMID: 32562420 PMC: 8023362. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjaa038.
Skeletal relapse following sagittal split ramus osteotomy advancement.
Sahoo N, Jayan B, Thakral A, Nagpal V J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015; 14(2):357-62.
PMID: 26028858 PMC: 4444677. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-014-0640-x.
TMJ response to mandibular advancement surgery: an overview of risk factors.
Valladares-Neto J, Cevidanes L, Rocha W, Almeida G, de Paiva J, Rino-Neto J J Appl Oral Sci. 2014; 22(1):2-14.
PMID: 24626243 PMC: 3908759. DOI: 10.1590/1678-775720130056.