Defining the Face Processing Network: Optimization of the Functional Localizer in FMRI

Overview

Journal Hum Brain Mapp

Publisher Wiley

Specialty Neurology

Date 2008 Jul 29

PMID 18661501

Citations 136

Authors

Christopher J Fox

Giuseppe Iaria

Jason J S Barton

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Functional localizers that contrast brain signal when viewing faces versus objects are commonly used in functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of face processing. However, current protocols do not reliably show all regions of the core system for face processing in all subjects when conservative statistical thresholds are used, which is problematic in the study of single subjects. Furthermore, arbitrary variations in the applied thresholds are associated with inconsistent estimates of the size of face-selective regions-of-interest (ROIs). We hypothesized that the use of more natural dynamic facial images in localizers might increase the likelihood of identifying face-selective ROIs in individual subjects, and we also investigated the use of a method to derive the statistically optimal ROI cluster size independent of thresholds. We found that dynamic facial stimuli were more effective than static stimuli, identifying 98% (versus 72% for static) of ROIs in the core face processing system and 69% (versus 39% for static) of ROIs in the extended face processing system. We then determined for each core face processing ROI, the cluster size associated with maximum statistical face-selectivity, which on average was approximately 50 mm(3) for the fusiform face area, the occipital face area, and the posterior superior temporal sulcus. We suggest that the combination of (a) more robust face-related activity induced by a dynamic face localizer and (b) a cluster-size determination based on maximum face-selectivity increases both the sensitivity and the specificity of the characterization of face-related ROIs in individual subjects.

Citing Articles

EEG during dynamic facial emotion processing reveals neural activity patterns associated with autistic traits in children.

Hill A, Ford T, Bailey N, Lum J, Bigelow F, Oberman L Cereb Cortex. 2025; 35(2).

PMID: 39927786 PMC: 11808805. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaf020.

Decoding dynamic faces and scenes without awareness under dis-continuous flash suppression.

Feng Y, Hung S, Hsieh P Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):151.

PMID: 39890886 PMC: 11785804. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07563-5.

Subregions in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex integrate threat and protective information to meta-represent safety.

Tashjian S, Cussen J, Deng W, Zhang B, Mobbs D PLoS Biol. 2025; 23(1):e3002986.

PMID: 39804855 PMC: 11730396. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002986.

A multimodal neural signature of face processing in autism within the fusiform gyrus.

Floris D, Llera A, Zabihi M, Moessnang C, Jones E, Mason L Nat Ment Health. 2025; 3(1):31-45.

PMID: 39802935 PMC: 11717707. DOI: 10.1038/s44220-024-00349-4.

Demystifying visual word form area visual and nonvisual response properties with precision fMRI.

Li J, Hiersche K, Saygin Z iScience. 2025; 27(12):111481.

PMID: 39759006 PMC: 11696768. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111481.

References

Andrews T, Ewbank M . Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe. Neuroimage. 2004; 23(3):905-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.060. View

McKeown M, Hanlon C . A post-processing/region of interest (ROI) method for discriminating patterns of activity in statistical maps of fMRI data. J Neurosci Methods. 2004; 135(1-2):137-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.12.021. View

Rossion B, Caldara R, Seghier M, Schuller A, Lazeyras F, Mayer E . A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. Brain. 2003; 126(Pt 11):2381-95. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awg241. View

Winston J, Henson R, Fine-Goulden M, Dolan R . fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. J Neurophysiol. 2004; 92(3):1830-9. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00155.2004. View

Puce A, Perrett D . Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003; 358(1431):435-45. PMC: 1693130. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1221. View

Sato W, Kochiyama T, Yoshikawa S, Naito E, Matsumura M . Enhanced neural activity in response to dynamic facial expressions of emotion: an fMRI study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004; 20(1):81-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.01.008. View

Mazard A, Schiltz C, Rossion B . Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia. 2005; 44(6):912-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.08.015. View

Barton J . Disorders of face perception and recognition. Neurol Clin. 2003; 21(2):521-48. DOI: 10.1016/s0733-8619(02)00106-8. View

Pelphrey K, Morris J, Michelich C, Allison T, McCarthy G . Functional anatomy of biological motion perception in posterior temporal cortex: an FMRI study of eye, mouth and hand movements. Cereb Cortex. 2005; 15(12):1866-76. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhi064. View

10.

Adolphs R, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio A . Cortical systems for the recognition of emotion in facial expressions. J Neurosci. 1996; 16(23):7678-87. PMC: 6579085. View

11.

Gobbini M, Haxby J . Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces. Neuropsychologia. 2006; 45(1):32-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.015. View

12.

Gobbini M, Haxby J . Neural response to the visual familiarity of faces. Brain Res Bull. 2006; 71(1-3):76-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.08.003. View

13.

Ishai A, Pessoa L, Bikle P, Ungerleider L . Repetition suppression of faces is modulated by emotion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(26):9827-32. PMC: 470759. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0403559101. View

14.

Benton C, Etchells P, Porter G, Clark A, Penton-Voak I, Nikolov S . Turning the other cheek: the viewpoint dependence of facial expression after-effects. Proc Biol Sci. 2007; 274(1622):2131-7. PMC: 2706192. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0473. View

15.

Yovel G, Kanwisher N . The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect. Curr Biol. 2005; 15(24):2256-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.072. View

16.

Yi D, Kelley T, Marois R, Chun M . Attentional modulation of repetition attenuation is anatomically dissociable for scenes and faces. Brain Res. 2006; 1080(1):53-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.090. View

17.

Genovese C, Lazar N, Nichols T . Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage. 2002; 15(4):870-8. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.1037. View

18.

Brewer A, Press W, Logothetis N, Wandell B . Visual areas in macaque cortex measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci. 2002; 22(23):10416-26. PMC: 6758759. View

19.

Grill-Spector K, Sayres R, Ress D . High-resolution imaging reveals highly selective nonface clusters in the fusiform face area. Nat Neurosci. 2006; 9(9):1177-85. DOI: 10.1038/nn1745. View

20.

Reddy L, Kanwisher N . Category selectivity in the ventral visual pathway confers robustness to clutter and diverted attention. Curr Biol. 2007; 17(23):2067-72. PMC: 2744456. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.043. View