» Articles » PMID: 18647425

Diet and Pregnancy Status in Australian Women

Overview
Date 2008 Jul 24
PMID 18647425
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate and report the diet quality of young Australian women by pregnancy status.

Design: Pregnancy status was defined as pregnant (n 606), trying to conceive (n 454), had a baby in the last 12 months (n 829) and other (n 5597). The Dietary Questionnaire for Epidemiological Studies was used to calculate diet quality using the Australian Recommended Food Score (ARFS) methodology. Nutrient intakes were compared with the Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand.

Setting: A population-based cohort participating in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (ALSWH).

Subjects: A nationally representative sample of Australian women, aged 25 to 30 years, who completed Survey 3 of the ALSWH. The 7486 women with biologically plausible energy intake estimates, defined as >4.5 but <20.0 MJ/d, were included in the analyses.

Results: Pregnancy status was not significantly predictive of diet quality, before or after adjusting for area of residence and socio-economic status. Pregnant women and those who had given birth in the previous 12 months had marginally higher ARFS (mean (se): 30.2 (0.4) and 30.2 (0.3), respectively) than 'other' women (29.1 (0.1)). No single food group accounted for this small difference. Across all pregnancy categories there were important nutrients that did not meet the current nationally recommended levels of intake, including dietary folate and fibre.

Conclusion: Women do not appear to consume a wider variety of nutritious foods when planning to become pregnant or during pregnancy. Many young Australian women are failing to meet key nutrient targets as nationally recommended.

Citing Articles

Association between diet quality during pregnancy of mothers and that of 3-year-old offspring: a prospective hospital-based birth cohort study.

Tada Y, Ishitsuka K, Piedvache A, Tanaka H, Ogawa K, Kobayashi M J Nutr Sci. 2025; 13():e26.

PMID: 39776520 PMC: 11704931. DOI: 10.1017/jns.2024.24.


Maternal diet quality and associations with plasma lipid profiles and pregnancy-related cardiometabolic health.

van der Pligt P, Kuswara K, McNaughton S, Abbott G, Islam S, Huynh K Eur J Nutr. 2023; 62(8):3369-3381.

PMID: 37646831 PMC: 10611854. DOI: 10.1007/s00394-023-03244-3.


Maternal diet quality and nutrient intakes across preconception and pregnancy are not consistent with Australian guidelines: Results from the pilot BABY1000 study.

Maneschi K, Geller T, Collins C, Gordon A, Grech A Food Sci Nutr. 2023; 11(7):4113-4123.

PMID: 37457169 PMC: 10345671. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.3401.


Women Taking a Folic Acid Supplement in Countries with Mandatory Food Fortification Programs May Be Exceeding the Upper Tolerable Limit of Folic Acid: A Systematic Review.

Ledowsky C, Mahimbo A, Scarf V, Steel A Nutrients. 2022; 14(13).

PMID: 35807899 PMC: 9268323. DOI: 10.3390/nu14132715.


Evaluating 'Power 4 a Healthy Pregnancy' (P4HP) - protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial and process evaluation to empower pregnant women towards improved diet quality.

van Lonkhuijzen R, Cremers S, de Vries J, Feskens E, Wagemakers A BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):148.

PMID: 35062921 PMC: 8780817. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-12543-z.