» Articles » PMID: 18644855

Sex Differences in Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales--a Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Schizophr Bull
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2008 Jul 23
PMID 18644855
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous single studies have found inconsistent results on sex differences in positive schizotypy, women scoring mainly higher than men, whereas in negative schizotypy studies have often found that men score higher than women. However, information on the overall effect is unknown. In this study, meta-analytic methods were used to estimate sex differences in Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales developed to measure schizotypal traits and psychosis proneness. We also studied the effect of the sample characteristics on possible differences. Studies on healthy populations were extensively collected; the required minimum sample size was 50. According to the results, men scored higher on the scales of negative schizotypy, ie, in the Physical Anhedonia Scale (n = 23 studies, effect size, Cohen d = 0.59, z test P < .001) and Social Anhedonia Scale (n = 14, d = 0.44, P < .001). Differences were virtually nonexistent in the measurements of the positive schizotypy, ie, the Magical Ideation Scale (n = 29, d = -0.01, P = .74) and Perceptual Aberration Scale (n = 22, d = -0.08, P = .05). The sex difference was larger in studies with nonstudent and older samples on the Perceptual Aberration Scale (d = -0.19 vs d = -0.03, P < .05). This study was the first one to pool studies on sex differences in these scales. The gender differences in social anhedonia both in nonclinical samples and in schizophrenia may relate to a broader aspect of social and interpersonal deficits. The results should be taken into account in studies using these instruments.

Citing Articles

Association between psychological distress and schizotypy in adults: A cross-sectional study.

Uchida H, Ohki S, Kuroiwa C, Tsuchiya K, Kikuchi S, Hirao K Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2024; 45(1):e12511.

PMID: 39729397 PMC: 11772104. DOI: 10.1002/npr2.12511.


Schizotypal traits and their relationship to reading abilities in healthy adults.

Byers N, MacIsaac S, MacGregor K, Whitford V Schizophr Res Cogn. 2024; 38:100327.

PMID: 39359348 PMC: 11445593. DOI: 10.1016/j.scog.2024.100327.


High Predictive Accuracy of Negative Schizotypy With Acoustic Measures.

Cohen A, Cox C, Cowan T, Masucci M, Le T, Docherty A Clin Psychol Sci. 2023; 10(2):310-323.

PMID: 38031625 PMC: 10686546. DOI: 10.1177/21677026211017835.


Social and physical anhedonia in relation to grandiose and vulnerable narcissism.

Linke-Jankowska M, Jankowski K Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2023; 9(1):46-52.

PMID: 38013696 PMC: 10663716. DOI: 10.5114/cipp.2021.104595.


Schizotypal traits in a large sample of high-school and university students from Tunisia: correlates and measurement invariance of the arabic schizotypal personality questionnaire across age and sex.

Fekih-Romdhane F, Hakiri A, Stambouli M, Cherif W, Away R, Amri A BMC Psychiatry. 2023; 23(1):447.

PMID: 37340441 PMC: 10283320. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-04942-2.


References
1.
Gooding D, Tallent K, Matts C . Clinical status of at-risk individuals 5 years later: further validation of the psychometric high-risk strategy. J Abnorm Psychol. 2005; 114(1):170-5. DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.114.1.170. View

2.
Dworkin R . Patterns of sex differences in negative symptoms and social functioning consistent with separate dimensions of schizophrenic psychopathology. Am J Psychiatry. 1990; 147(3):347-9. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.147.3.347. View

3.
Chmielewski P, Fernandes L, Yee C, Miller G . Ethnicity and gender in scales of psychosis proneness and mood disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 1995; 104(3):464-70. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.104.3.464. View

4.
Dumas P, Saoud M, Gutknecht C, Dalery J, DAmato T . [French translations and adaptations of questionnaires of magical thinking (MIS, Eckblad and Chapman, 1983) and perception disorders (PAS, Chapman et al., 1978)]. Encephale. 1999; 25(5):422-8. View

5.
Jaspers-Fayer F, Peters M . Hand preference, magical thinking and left-right confusion. Laterality. 2005; 10(2):183-91. DOI: 10.1080/13576500442000021. View