» Articles » PMID: 18638075

Cost-effectiveness Analysis on Screening for Colorectal Neoplasm and Management of Colorectal Cancer in Asia

Overview
Date 2008 Jul 22
PMID 18638075
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Faecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) and colonoscopy are recommended for subjects above 50 years of age for screening for colorectal cancer (CRC).

Aim: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of FOBT, FS and colonoscopy on the basis of disease prevalence, compliance rate and cost of screening procedures in Asian countries.

Methods: A hypothetical population of 100 000 persons aged 50 undergoes either FOBT annually, FS every 5 years or colonoscopy every 10 years until the age of 80 years. Patients with positive FOBT or polyp in FS are offered colonoscopy. Surveillance colonoscopy is repeated every 3 years. The treatment cost of CRC, including surgery and chemotherapy, was evaluated. A Markov model was used to compare the cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies.

Results: Assuming a compliance rate of 90%, colonoscopy, FS and FOBT can reduce CRC incidence by 54.1%, 37.1% and 29.3% respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for FOBT (US$6222 per life-year saved) is lower than FS (US$8044 per life-year saved) and colonoscopy (US$7211 per life-year saved). When the compliance rate drops to 50% and 30%, FOBT still has the lowest ICER.

Conclusion: FOBT is cost-effective compared to FS or colonoscopy for CRC screening in average-risk individuals aged from 50 to 80 years.

Citing Articles

Cost effectiveness analysis of three colorectal cancer screening modalities in Kuwait.

Nur A, Aljunid S, Tolma E, Annaka M, Alwotayan R, Elbasmi A Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7354.

PMID: 40025065 PMC: 11873134. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91119-4.


Cancer screening programs in South-east Asia and Western Pacific.

Wee H, Canfell K, Chiu H, Choi K, Cox B, Bhoo-Pathy N BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):102.

PMID: 38238704 PMC: 10797973. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10327-8.


The Use of a Non-Invasive Biomarker for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Comparative Cost-Effectiveness Modeling Study.

Wong M, Huang J, Wong Y, Ko S, Chan V, Ng S Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(3).

PMID: 36765591 PMC: 9913459. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030633.


Colorectal Cancer Mortality in Kazakhstan: Spatio-Temporal Epidemiological Assessment.

Mauyenova D, Axarin A, Telmanova Z, Baibusunova A, Bilyalova Z, Igissinova G Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022; 23(3):953-960.

PMID: 35345368 PMC: 9360941. DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.3.953.


Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Medina-Lara A, Grigore B, Lewis R, Peters J, Price S, Landa P Health Technol Assess. 2020; 24(66):1-332.

PMID: 33252328 PMC: 7768788. DOI: 10.3310/hta24660.