» Articles » PMID: 18633564

Incidence of Accessory Ossicles and Sesamoid Bones in the Feet: a Radiographic Study of the Turkish Subjects

Overview
Date 2008 Jul 18
PMID 18633564
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Most accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones of the ankle and the foot remain asymptomatic; however, they have increasingly been examined in the radiology literature, because they can cause painful syndromes or degenerative changes in response to overuse and trauma. Our aim was to document a detailed investigation on the accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones of Turkish subjects in both the feet according to the sex, frequency and division of the bones, coexistence and bilaterality by radiography. A double-centered study was performed retrospectively to determine the incidence of the accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones in the ankle and foot. Accessory ossicles (21.2%) and sesamoid bones (9.6%) were detected by Radiographs of 984 subjects. The most common accessory ossicles were accessory navicular (11.7%), os peroneum (4.7%), os trigonum (2.3%), os supranaviculare (1.6%), os vesalianum (0.4%), os supratalare (0.2%), os intermetatarseum (0.2%). We observed bipartite hallux sesamoid in 2.7% of radiographs. Interphalangeal sesamoid bone of the hallux was seen in 2% of radiographs. Incidences of metatarsophalangeal sesamoid bones were found as 0.4% in the second digit, 0.2% third digit, 0.1% fourth digit and 4.3% fifth digit. We also identified the coexistencies of two different accessory ossicles as 6%, accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones as 7%, and bipartite sesamoid bones and sesamoid bones as 1.9%. Distribution of the most common accessory ossicles in male and female subjects was similar. We reported the incidence of accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones of the feet in Turkish adult population.

Citing Articles

Computed Tomography Assessment of Os Trigonum in the Omani Population and Its Clinical Relevance.

Al Thuhli Z, Al Farsi M, Mahfouz Y, Al Mamari G, Al-Mufargi Y, Bouchareb Y Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39941303 PMC: 11817386. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15030373.


Prevalence of accessory navicular in Japanese children: A cross-sectional study using ultrasound-Katsuragi Integrated Defense for Locomotive Syndrome in children study.

Sasaki T, Teraguchi M, Mure K, Asai Y, Kido Y, Onishi M PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0318014.

PMID: 39854496 PMC: 11759391. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318014.


Os Vesalianum Pedis in a Professional Badminton Player: A Case Report.

Roy Mohan N, Dominic D Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e68411.

PMID: 39360107 PMC: 11446485. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.68411.


Sustainable treatment success of an Os naviculare syndrome using conservative measures, infiltration therapy, and shock waves.

Andresen J, Radmer S, Puchner S J Surg Case Rep. 2024; 2024(8):rjae544.

PMID: 39211370 PMC: 11358045. DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjae544.


The prevalence and anatomy of accessory navicular bone: a meta-analysis.

Stolarz K, Osiowski A, Preinl M, Osiowski M, Jasiewicz B, Taterra D Surg Radiol Anat. 2024; 46(10):1731-1743.

PMID: 39136746 PMC: 11405447. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-024-03459-x.


References
1.
Lawson J . International Skeletal Society Lecture in honor of Howard D. Dorfman. Clinically significant radiologic anatomic variants of the skeleton. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994; 163(2):249-55. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.163.2.8037009. View

2.
Inoue T, Yoshimura I, Ogata K, Emoto G . Os vesalianum as a cause of lateral foot pain: a familial case and its treatment. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2000; 8(1):56-8. View

3.
Roukis T, Hurless J . The hallucal interphalangeal sesamoid. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996; 35(4):303-8; discussion 372. DOI: 10.1016/s1067-2516(96)80078-0. View

4.
Le Minor J . Congenital absence of the lateral metatarso-phalangeal sesamoid bone of the human hallux: a case report. Surg Radiol Anat. 1999; 21(3):225-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF01630908. View

5.
SHANDS Jr A, WENTZ I . Congenital anomalies, accessory bones, and osteochondritis in the feet of 850 children. Surg Clin North Am. 1953; :1643-66. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)34091-9. View