» Articles » PMID: 18631335

Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Glaucoma Practice

Overview
Journal Acta Ophthalmol
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2008 Jul 18
PMID 18631335
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) readings taken using dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) with IOP readings taken with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Methods: The present study included 100 eyes in 100 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. After pachymetry DCT and GAT were performed. Intraocular pressures as measured with DCT and GAT were compared with one another and with central corneal thickness (CCT).

Results: Mean DCT IOP measurements (20.1 +/- 4.3 mmHg) were significantly (p < 0.001) higher than GAT IOP values (17.9 +/- 4.7 mmHg). The mean difference between DCT and GAT measurements was 2.1 mmHg (range -3.4 to 9.7 mmHg). The difference followed a normal distribution. Measurements made with DCT and GAT correlated significantly with one another (Spearman's rho = 0.761, p < 0.001). Neither GAT nor DCT measurements showed a significant correlation with CCT (537 +/- 39 microm, range 458-656 microm). Multivariate regression analysis has shown that the difference between DCT and GAT is influenced significantly by ocular pulse amplitude (r = -0.334, p = 0.001) and it is not influenced by CCT (r = -0.106, p = 0.292).

Conclusions: In eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension, DCT facilitates suitable and reliable IOP measurements which are in good concordance with GAT readings. Variation in CCT cannot by itself explain the differences in measurements taken with DCT and GAT in a number of eyes.

Citing Articles

The influence of altitude on the differences between Goldmann tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry: An ecological meta-analysis.

Albis-Donado O, Ramirez-Neria P, Rios-Acosta N, Stalmans I Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023; 72(Suppl 3):S398-S403.

PMID: 38099358 PMC: 467013. DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_907_23.


Citius, Altius, Fortius: Agreement between Perkins and Dynamic Contour Tonometry (Pascal) and the Impact of Altitude.

Albis-Donado O, Bhartiya S, Gil-Reyes M, Casale-Vargas G, Arreguin-Rebollar N, Kahook M J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2018; 12(1):40-44.

PMID: 29861581 PMC: 5981092. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1242.


Utility of Goldmann applanation tonometry for monitoring intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients with a history of laser refractive surgery.

Lee S, Bae H, Kwon H, Seong G, Kim C PLoS One. 2018; 13(2):e0192344.

PMID: 29401477 PMC: 5798809. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192344.


Dependence of dynamic contour and Goldmann applanation tonometries on peripheral corneal thickness.

Saenz-Frances F, Sanz-Pozo C, Borrego-Sanz L, Janez L, Morales-Fernandez L, Martinez-de-la-Casa J Int J Ophthalmol. 2017; 10(10):1521-1527.

PMID: 29062770 PMC: 5638972. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2017.10.07.


Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature.

Andreanos K, Koutsandrea C, Papaconstantinou D, Diagourtas A, Kotoulas A, Dimitrakas P Clin Ophthalmol. 2016; 10:2477-2484.

PMID: 28003737 PMC: 5158174. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S115203.