» Articles » PMID: 18629518

Validation and Clinical Significance of a New Calprotectin Rapid Test for the Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Diseases

Overview
Date 2008 Jul 17
PMID 18629518
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Objective of this study was to compare the assay characteristics of a new fecal calprotectin rapid test with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The second aim was to assess the potential of measuring fecal calprotectin as screening method for intestinal inflammation and colorectal malignancies.

Patients And Methods: One hundred forty patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms referred to colonoscopy provided fecal samples (56, control group; 18, diverticulosis; 29, colorectal adenoma; 8, colorectal carcinoma (CRC); 18, active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); 11, intestinal infections). Feces were analyzed by two assay methods.

Results: Compared to the control group (median 25.8 microg/g), calprotectin levels were significantly increased in adenoma (66.3 microg/g), CRC (164 microg/g), intestinal infections (306 microg/g), and active IBD (797 microg/g). An adequate diagnostic accuracy could be found for active IBD with a sensitivity, specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 100%, 79%, and 0.955 (ELISA) vs. 89%, 80%, and 0.896 (rapid test). Similar results were obtained for CRC (100%, 79%, 0.922 vs. 100%, 80%, 0.948) whereas in adenomas a low sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 55%, 79%, and 0.686 vs. 52%, 80%, and 0.666 were found for fecal calprotectin.

Conclusions: Both fecal calprotectin assays are effective in identifying active IBD and CRC but lack analytical sensitivity in separating CRC from adenoma as well as adenoma from the control group. The new calprotectin rapid test is a convenient method for assessing the calprotectin level in an outpatient setting. Henceforth, it provides a precondition for the fecal calprotectin method to challenge fecal occult blood testing in further evaluations.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic value of fecal calprotectin in primary care patients with gastrointestinal symptoms: A retrospective Swedish cohort study.

Rendek Z, Falk M, Grodzinsky E, Kechagias S, Hjortswang H JGH Open. 2023; 7(10):708-716.

PMID: 37908296 PMC: 10615176. DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12972.


Fecal Calprotectin and Organic Gastrointestinal Disease: A Systematic Review.

Asiri A, Algarni S, Althubaiti A, Alzubaidi M, Alghamdi J, Almalki G Cureus. 2023; 15(9):e45019.

PMID: 37829963 PMC: 10565882. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45019.


The role of faecal calprotectin in diagnosis and staging of colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ross F, Park J, Mansouri D, Combet E, Horgan P, McMillan D BMC Gastroenterol. 2022; 22(1):176.

PMID: 35397505 PMC: 8994317. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02220-1.


Comparison of faecal protein biomarkers' diagnostic accuracy for colorectal advanced neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nasir Kansestani A, Zare M, Tong Q, Zhang J Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):2623.

PMID: 35173276 PMC: 8850428. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06689-4.


Pre-and post-treatment evaluation of intestinal inflammation in and infected children: a community-based study.

Ibrahim H, Salem A, Ahmed N, El-Taweel H J Parasit Dis. 2021; 45(4):1026-1033.

PMID: 34789986 PMC: 8556472. DOI: 10.1007/s12639-021-01398-7.


References
1.
Roseth A, Kristinsson J, Fagerhol M, Schjonsby H, Aadland E, Nygaard K . Faecal calprotectin: a novel test for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer?. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993; 28(12):1073-6. DOI: 10.3109/00365529309098312. View

2.
Brun J, Ulvestad E, Fagerhol M, Jonsson R . Effects of human calprotectin (L1) on in vitro immunoglobulin synthesis. Scand J Immunol. 1994; 40(6):675-80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1994.tb03523.x. View

3.
Hoff G, Grotmol T, Thiis-Evensen E, Bretthauer M, Gondal G, Vatn M . Testing for faecal calprotectin (PhiCal) in the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention trial on flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: comparison with an immunochemical test for occult blood (FlexSure OBT). Gut. 2004; 53(9):1329-33. PMC: 1774205. DOI: 10.1136/gut.2004.039032. View

4.
Carroccio A, Iacono G, Cottone M, Di Prima L, Cartabellotta F, Cavataio F . Diagnostic accuracy of fecal calprotectin assay in distinguishing organic causes of chronic diarrhea from irritable bowel syndrome: a prospective study in adults and children. Clin Chem. 2003; 49(6 Pt 1):861-7. DOI: 10.1373/49.6.861. View

5.
DInca R, Dal Pont E, Di Leo V, Ferronato A, Fries W, Vettorato M . Calprotectin and lactoferrin in the assessment of intestinal inflammation and organic disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006; 22(4):429-37. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-006-0159-9. View