» Articles » PMID: 18627059

Fear of Health Insurance Loss Among Individuals at Risk for Huntington Disease

Overview
Specialty Genetics
Date 2008 Jul 16
PMID 18627059
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genetic testing in Huntington disease, an inherited ultimately fatal neurodegenerative disorder, is infrequent despite wide availability. Factors influencing the decision to pursue testing are largely unknown. We conducted a prospective longitudinal observational study of 1,001 individuals in North America who were at risk for Huntington disease who had not pursued genetic testing prior to enrollment. We evaluated the rationale for remaining untested at baseline, determined the concerns of those who eventually pursued testing, and assessed the population's psychological attributes. We contrasted responses between those who did and did not pursue testing, and between United States and Canadian residents. The principal reasons for remaining untested were comfort with risk and uncertainty and the inability to "undo" knowledge gained. After enrollment, 83 individuals [8.3%] pursued genetic testing. Their greatest concern was losing health insurance, and 41.6% of them [vs. 6.7% of those who did not pursue testing; P < 0.001] reported paying out of pocket for testing or other medical services to conceal their genetic risk from their insurer/employer. Among individuals who were tested, more United States residents [46.1%] than Canadian residents [0.0%; P = 0.02] paid out of pocket for health services or genetic testing. Psychological attributes were similar among individuals who did and did not pursue testing. Individuals at risk for Huntington disease who pursued genetic testing feared losing medical insurance, and many paid out of pocket for medical services. Alleviating the fear of health insurance loss may help those who want to pursue genetic testing for many other conditions. [ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT0052143].

Citing Articles

Attitudes Toward Providing Open Access for Use of Biospecimens and Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan.

Al-Shami K, Ahmed W, Alzoubi K Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023; 17:895-903.

PMID: 37013082 PMC: 10066730. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S402769.


Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review.

Wauters A, Van Hoyweghen I J Hum Genet. 2016; 61(4):275-82.

PMID: 26740237 DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2015.151.


Interest in genetic testing in Ashkenazi Jewish Parkinson's disease patients and their unaffected relatives.

Gupte M, Alcalay R, Mejia-Santana H, Raymond D, Saunders-Pullman R, Roos E J Genet Couns. 2014; 24(2):238-46.

PMID: 25127731 PMC: 4331260. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9756-x.


Predictors of genetic testing decisions: a systematic review and critique of the literature.

Sweeny K, Ghane A, Legg A, Huynh H, Andrews S J Genet Couns. 2014; 23(3):263-88.

PMID: 24719248 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9712-9.


What Factors Impact upon a Woman's Decision to Undertake Genetic Cancer Testing?.

Quinlivan J, Battikhi Z, Petersen R Front Oncol. 2014; 3:325.

PMID: 24432248 PMC: 3880931. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00325.


References
1.
Carver C, Pozo-Kaderman C, Harris S, Noriega V, Scheier M, Robinson D . Optimism versus pessimism predicts the quality of women's adjustment to early stage breast cancer. Cancer. 1994; 73(4):1213-20. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940215)73:4<1213::aid-cncr2820730415>3.0.co;2-q. View

2.
Klitzman R, Thorne D, Williamson J, Chung W, Marder K . Disclosures of Huntington disease risk within families: patterns of decision-making and implications. Am J Med Genet A. 2007; 143A(16):1835-49. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31864. View

3.
Lipkin S, Afrasiabi K . Familial colorectal cancer syndrome X. Semin Oncol. 2007; 34(5):425-7. DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2007.07.008. View

4.
Chai C . The genetics of Alzheimer's disease. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2007; 22(1):37-41. PMC: 10697204. DOI: 10.1177/1533317506295655. View

5.
Eltis K . Genetic determinism and discrimination: a call to re-orient prevailing human rights discourse to better comport with the public implications of individual genetic testing. J Law Med Ethics. 2007; 35(2):282-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2007.00137.x. View