» Articles » PMID: 18621702

An Ecosystem Services Framework to Support Both Practical Conservation and Economic Development

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2008 Jul 16
PMID 18621702
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The core idea of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment is that the human condition is tightly linked to environmental condition. This assertion suggests that conservation and development projects should be able to achieve both ecological and social progress without detracting from their primary objectives. Whereas "win-win" projects that achieve both conservation and economic gains are a commendable goal, they are not easy to attain. An analysis of World Bank projects with objectives of alleviating poverty and protecting biodiversity revealed that only 16% made major progress on both objectives. Here, we provide a framework for anticipating win-win, lose-lose, and win-lose outcomes as a result of how people manage their ecosystem services. This framework emerges from detailed explorations of several case studies in which biodiversity conservation and economic development coincide and cases in which there is joint failure. We emphasize that scientific advances around ecosystem service production functions, tradeoffs among multiple ecosystem services, and the design of appropriate monitoring programs are necessary for the implementation of conservation and development projects that will successfully advance both environmental and social goals. The potentially bright future of jointly advancing ecosystem services, conservation, and human well-being will be jeopardized unless a global monitoring effort is launched that uses the many ongoing projects as a grand experiment.

Citing Articles

Multidimensional patterns of bird diversity and its driving forces in the Yangtze River Basin of China.

Liu W, Mu T, Yuan S, Yi J, Yu D, Li J Eco Environ Health. 2025; 4(1):100124.

PMID: 39925482 PMC: 11803227. DOI: 10.1016/j.eehl.2024.10.001.


Exploring the complex trade-offs and synergies of global ecosystem services.

Wang J, Wu W, Yang M, Gao Y, Shao J, Yang W Environ Sci Ecotechnol. 2024; 21:100391.

PMID: 38328510 PMC: 10847997. DOI: 10.1016/j.ese.2024.100391.


Integrated assessment and mapping of provisioning services for sustainable management of natural resources, the case of Lake Hawassa Basin, Ethiopia.

Reta B, Soromessa T Heliyon. 2024; 10(3):e24847.

PMID: 38322921 PMC: 10844028. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24847.


Long-Term Effects of Ecological Restoration Projects on Ecosystem Services and Their Spatial Interactions: A Case Study of Hainan Tropical Forest Park in China.

Zhong J, Cui L, Deng Z, Zhang Y, Lin J, Guo G Environ Manage. 2023; 73(3):493-508.

PMID: 37853251 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-023-01892-z.


Economic-ecological services and their trade-offs or synergies of agricultural landscapes in Xiangxi, central China.

Xiang H Heliyon. 2023; 9(8):e19145.

PMID: 37664729 PMC: 10469579. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19145.


References
1.
Ludwig D, Hilborn R, Walters C . Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: lessons from history. Science. 1993; 260(5104):17-36. DOI: 10.1126/science.260.5104.17. View

2.
Adams W, Aveling R, Brockington D, Dickson B, Elliott J, Hutton J . Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science. 2004; 306(5699):1146-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1097920. View

3.
Kareiva P, Marvier M . Conservation for the people. Sci Am. 2007; 297(4):50-7. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican1007-50. View

4.
Chivian E, Bernstein A . Embedded in nature: human health and biodiversity. Environ Health Perspect. 2003; 112(1):A12-3. PMC: 1241805. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.112-a12. View

5.
Tallis H, Kareiva P . Shaping global environmental decisions using socio-ecological models. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006; 21(10):562-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.07.009. View