Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in a Patient with Operable Breast Cancer
Overview
Affiliations
Purpose: This study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of performing a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for a patient with operable breast cancer after undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).
Method: Between January 2002 and December 2003, women with primary breast cancer who had a breast tumor measuring larger than 3 cm in unilateral diameter were eligible for NAC. All patients who had completed NAC underwent lymphatic mapping with labeled (99m)Tc phytate on the day before surgery. Sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by a full axillary lymph node (AXLN) dissection (ALND) was performed in all patients. Sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) were sent for a frozen-section examination.
Results: The rate of SLN identification was 71%. Both the sensitivity and negative predictive value of SLNB were 100%. The false negative rate was 0%. When candidates for SLNB were restricted to patients with a breast tumor measuring less than 3 cm and clinically negative nodes after NAC, the rate of SLN identification increased to 93% from 71% while still maintaining the 0% false negative rate.
Conclusion: Sentinel lymph node biopsy after NAC is therefore considered to be a feasible and accurate method to predict the AXLN status in patients who have a breast tumor measuring less than 3 cm in unilateral diameter and a clinically negative AXLN status at the time of surgery after NAC.
Pantiora E, Eriksson S, Warnberg F, Karakatsanis A Br J Surg. 2024; 111(2).
PMID: 38325801 PMC: 10849829. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae008.
Lin S, Vo N, Yen Y, Tam K Ann Surg Oncol. 2022; 29(5):3038-3049.
PMID: 35018590 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11297-z.
Parada D, Pena K, Riu F, Aguilar A, Cohan S Mol Clin Oncol. 2016; 5(5):507-510.
PMID: 27882235 PMC: 5103850. DOI: 10.3892/mco.2016.1025.
Ge W, Yang B, Zuo W, Zheng G, Dai Y, Han C Thorac Cancer. 2016; 5(6):550-5.
PMID: 26767051 PMC: 4704328. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12131.
Hattori M, Nishimura S, Tada K, Koyama M, Akiyama F, Ito Y Surg Today. 2011; 41(2):247-50.
PMID: 21264762 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-009-4241-0.