» Articles » PMID: 18609465

Colonoscopy is the Preferred Colorectal Cancer Screening Method in a Population-based Program

Overview
Journal Endoscopy
Date 2008 Jul 9
PMID 18609465
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Study Aims: Various screening methods for colorectal cancer (CRC) are promoted by professional societies; however, few data are available about the factors that determine patient participation in screening, which is crucial to the success of population-based programs. This study aimed (i) to identify factors that determine acceptance of screening and preference of screening method, and (ii) to evaluate procedure success, detection of colorectal neoplasia, and patient satisfaction with screening colonoscopy.

Patients And Methods: Following a public awareness campaign, the population aged 50 - 80 years was offered CRC screening in the form of annual fecal occult blood tests, flexible sigmoidoscopy, a combination of both, or colonoscopy.

Results: 2731 asymptomatic persons (12.0 % of the target population) registered with and were eligible to take part in the screening program. Access to information and a positive attitude to screening were major determinants of participation. Colonoscopy was the method preferred by 74.8 % of participants. Advanced colorectal neoplasia was present in 8.5 %; its prevalence was higher in males and increased with age. Significant complications occurred in 0.5 % of those undergoing colonoscopy and were associated with polypectomy or sedation. Most patients were satisfied with colonoscopy and over 90 % would choose it again for CRC screening.

Conclusions: In this population-based study, only a small proportion of the target population underwent CRC screening despite an extensive information campaign. Colonoscopy was the preferred method and was safe. The determinants of participation in screening and preference of screening method, together with the distribution of colorectal neoplasia in different demographic categories, provide a rationale for improving screening procedures.

Citing Articles

Change in colorectal cancer (CRC) testing rates associated with the introduction of the first organized screening program in canton Uri, Switzerland: Evidence from insurance claims data analyses from 2010 to 2018.

Bissig S, Syrogiannouli L, Schneider R, Tal K, Selby K, Del Giovane C Prev Med Rep. 2022; 28:101851.

PMID: 35757577 PMC: 9218582. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101851.


Patient-directed vs. fixed-volume PEG for colonoscopy preparation: a randomized controlled trial.

Zhang J, Jia X, Guo Y, Jiang H, Hu J, Wang S Precis Clin Med. 2022; 5(2):pbac009.

PMID: 35694717 PMC: 9172656. DOI: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbac009.


Colorectal cancer surveillance by colonoscopy in a prospective, population-based long-term Swiss screening study - outcomes, adherence, and costs.

Zgraggen A, Stoffel S, Barbier M, Marbet U Z Gastroenterol. 2022; 60(5):761-778.

PMID: 35545112 PMC: 9179214. DOI: 10.1055/a-1796-2471.


Association between colorectal cancer testing and insurance type: Evidence from the Swiss Health Interview Survey 2012.

Braun A, Kassner A, Syrogiannouli L, Selby K, Bulliard J, Martin Y Prev Med Rep. 2020; 19:101111.

PMID: 32426215 PMC: 7226870. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101111.


Experience with a colorectal cancer campaign in Swiss pharmacies.

Ruggli M, Stebler D, Gasteiger M, Trottmann M, Hochuli P, Telser H Int J Clin Pharm. 2019; 41(5):1359-1364.

PMID: 31564044 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-019-00899-z.