» Articles » PMID: 18607593

Solitary Pulmonary Nodules and Masses: a Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Utility of Alternative Imaging Tests

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2008 Jul 9
PMID 18607593
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose was to assess the clinical utility of diagnostic tests for identifying malignancy within a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN), and to create a nomogram or "look-up" table using clinical data and non-invasive radiology (positive) test results to estimate post-test probability of malignancy. Studies that examined computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for the evaluation of SPN. Two reviewers independently abstracted data and assessed study quality. Study-specific and overall positive likelihood ratios (LRs) for each diagnostic test confirming a diagnosis of malignancy and negative LR for each diagnostic test excluding a diagnosis of malignancy within an SPN were calculated. Forty-four of 242 articles were included. Positive LRs for diagnostic tests were: CT 3.91 (95% confidence interval 2.42, 5.40), MRI 4.57 (3.03, 6.1), PET 5.44 (3.56, 7.32) and SPECT 5.16 (4.03, 6.30). Negative LRs were: CT 0.10 (0.03, 0.16), MRI 0.08 (0.03, 0.12), PET 0.06 (0.02, 0.09) and SPECT 0.06 (0.04, 0.08). Differences in performance for all tests were negligible; therefore, the clinician may confidently use any of the four tests presented in further evaluating an SPN. Given the low cost and prevalence of the technology, SPECT appears to be the leading choice for additional testing in SPN evaluation.

Citing Articles

Differential diagnosis of lung cancer and benign lung lesion using salivary metabolites: A preliminary study.

Takamori S, Ishikawa S, Suzuki J, Oizumi H, Uchida T, Ueda S Thorac Cancer. 2021; 13(3):460-465.

PMID: 34918488 PMC: 8807259. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14282.


Prone position [F]FDG PET/CT to reduce respiratory motion artefacts in the evaluation of lung nodules.

Lee H, Son H, Yun M, Moon J, Kim Y, Woo J Eur Radiol. 2021; 31(7):4606-4614.

PMID: 33852046 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07894-x.


Diagnostic performance of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of solitary pulmonary nodule: a meta-analysis.

Divisi D, Barone M, Bertolaccini L, Zaccagna G, Gabriele F, Crisci R J Thorac Dis. 2018; 10(Suppl 7):S779-S789.

PMID: 29780624 PMC: 5945698. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.12.126.


Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with lung cancer: A meta-analysis.

Chen G, Wang M, Zheng T, Tang G, Han F, Tu G Mol Clin Oncol. 2017; 6(3):344-354.

PMID: 28451411 PMC: 5403316. DOI: 10.3892/mco.2017.1153.


Is quality and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in high impact radiology journals associated with citation rates?.

van der Pol C, McInnes M, Petrcich W, Tunis A, Hanna R PLoS One. 2015; 10(3):e0119892.

PMID: 25775455 PMC: 4361663. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119892.


References
1.
Vandenbroucke J . Passive smoking and lung cancer: a publication bias?. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988; 296(6619):391-2. PMC: 2544973. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.296.6619.391. View

2.
Lillington G . Management of solitary pulmonary nodules. Dis Mon. 1991; 37(5):271-318. DOI: 10.1016/s0011-5029(05)80012-4. View

3.
Dickersin K, Berlin J . Meta-analysis: state-of-the-science. Epidemiol Rev. 1992; 14:154-76. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036084. View

4.
Tozaki M, Ichiba N, Fukuda K . Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of solitary pulmonary nodules: utility of kinetic patterns in differential diagnosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005; 29(1):13-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000153287.79730.9b. View

5.
Jeong Y, Yi C, Lee K . Solitary pulmonary nodules: detection, characterization, and guidance for further diagnostic workup and treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 188(1):57-68. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.2131. View