Mammographic Density. Measurement of Mammographic Density

Overview

Journal Breast Cancer Res

Specialty Oncology

Date 2008 Jul 5

PMID 18598375

Citations 106

Authors

Martin J Yaffe

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Mammographic density has been strongly associated with increased risk of breast cancer. Furthermore, density is inversely correlated with the accuracy of mammography and, therefore, a measurement of density conveys information about the difficulty of detecting cancer in a mammogram. Initial methods for assessing mammographic density were entirely subjective and qualitative; however, in the past few years methods have been developed to provide more objective and quantitative density measurements. Research is now underway to create and validate techniques for volumetric measurement of density. It is also possible to measure breast density with other imaging modalities, such as ultrasound and MRI, which do not require the use of ionizing radiation and may, therefore, be more suitable for use in young women or where it is desirable to perform measurements more frequently. In this article, the techniques for measurement of density are reviewed and some consideration is given to their strengths and limitations.

Citing Articles

Machine Learning-Based Approaches for Breast Density Estimation from Mammograms: A Comprehensive Review.

Alhusari K, Dhou S J Imaging. 2025; 11(2).

PMID: 39997539 PMC: 11856162. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging11020038.

A Deep Learning Approach for the Classification of Fibroglandular Breast Density in Histology Images of Human Breast Tissue.

Heydarlou H, Hodson L, Dorraki M, Hickey T, Tilley W, Smith E Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941816 PMC: 11816254. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030449.

A Framework for Interpretability in Machine Learning for Medical Imaging.

Wang A, Karaman B, Kim H, Rosenthal J, Saluja R, Young S IEEE Access. 2024; 12:53277-53292.

PMID: 39421804 PMC: 11486155. DOI: 10.1109/access.2024.3387702.

Comparison of Visual and Quantra Software Mammographic Density Assessment According to BI-RADS in 2D and 3D Images.

Morciano F, Marcazzan C, Rella R, Tommasini O, Conti M, Belli P J Imaging. 2024; 10(9).

PMID: 39330458 PMC: 11433353. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging10090238.

Weight to volume conversion: an easy and practical breast volume estimation.

Sirimahachaiyakul P, Boonjunwetwat D, Meevassana J, Manasnayakorn S, Angspatt A Gland Surg. 2023; 12(10):1387-1394.

PMID: 38021204 PMC: 10660182. DOI: 10.21037/gs-23-262.

References

Wolfe J, Saftlas A, Salane M . Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987; 148(6):1087-92. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.148.6.1087. View

Graham S, Bronskill M, Byng J, Yaffe M, Boyd N . Quantitative correlation of breast tissue parameters using magnetic resonance and X-ray mammography. Br J Cancer. 1996; 73(2):162-8. PMC: 2074314. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1996.30. View

Sivaramakrishna R, Obuchowski N, Chilcote W, Powell K . Automatic segmentation of mammographic density. Acad Radiol. 2001; 8(3):250-6. DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80534-2. View

Mitchell G, Antoniou A, Warren R, Peock S, Brown J, Davies R . Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Cancer Res. 2006; 66(3):1866-72. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3368. View

Li H, Giger M, Huo Z, Olopade O, Lan L, Weber B . Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location. Med Phys. 2004; 31(3):549-55. DOI: 10.1118/1.1644514. View

Gram I, Bremnes Y, Ursin G, Maskarinec G, Bjurstam N, Lund E . Percentage density, Wolfe's and Tabár's mammographic patterns: agreement and association with risk factors for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2005; 7(5):R854-61. PMC: 1242160. DOI: 10.1186/bcr1308. View

Zhou C, Chan H, Petrick N, Helvie M, Goodsitt M, Sahiner B . Computerized image analysis: estimation of breast density on mammograms. Med Phys. 2001; 28(6):1056-69. DOI: 10.1118/1.1376640. View

Johns P, Yaffe M . X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. Phys Med Biol. 1987; 32(6):675-95. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/32/6/002. View

van Engeland S, Snoeren P, Huisman H, Boetes C, Karssemeijer N . Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006; 25(3):273-82. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2005.862741. View

10.

Boyd N, Lockwood G, Byng J, Tritchler D, Yaffe M . Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998; 7(12):1133-44. View

11.

Wu T, Stewart A, Stanton M, McCauley T, Phillips W, Kopans D . Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images. Med Phys. 2003; 30(3):365-80. DOI: 10.1118/1.1543934. View

12.

Taylor P, Hajnal S, Dilhuydy M, Barreau B . Measuring image texture to separate "difficult" from "easy" mammograms. Br J Radiol. 1994; 67(797):456-63. DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-67-797-456. View

13.

Byng J, Boyd N, Fishell E, Jong R, Yaffe M . The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol. 1994; 39(10):1629-38. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/39/10/008. View

14.

Karssemeijer N . Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms. Phys Med Biol. 1998; 43(2):365-78. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/43/2/011. View

15.

Von Moos R, Ruhstaller T, Fretz C . CASE 3. Red eye in Sjogren's syndrome due to underlying mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(6):1011-3. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.1544. View

16.

Palomares M, Machia J, Lehman C, Daling J, McTiernan A . Mammographic density correlation with Gail model breast cancer risk estimates and component risk factors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15(7):1324-30. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0689. View

17.

Glide-Hurst C, Duric N, Littrup P . A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density. Med Phys. 2007; 34(11):4491-8. DOI: 10.1118/1.2789407. View

18.

Saftlas A, Hoover R, Brinton L, Szklo M, Olson D, Salane M . Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer. Cancer. 1991; 67(11):2833-8. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910601)67:11<2833::aid-cncr2820671121>3.0.co;2-u. View

19.

Li H, Giger M, Olopade O, Lan L . Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment. Acad Radiol. 2007; 14(5):513-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.02.003. View

20.

Caldwell C, Stapleton S, Holdsworth D, Jong R, WEISER W, Cooke G . Characterisation of mammographic parenchymal pattern by fractal dimension. Phys Med Biol. 1990; 35(2):235-47. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/35/2/004. View