Predictors of Functional Independence and Stress Level of Stroke Survivors at Discharge from Inpatient Rehabilitation
Overview
Nursing
Authors
Affiliations
Background And Research Objective: Stroke is the primary cause of long-term disability among older adults. This study identifies predictors of functional independence and perceived stress for stroke survivors discharged home from inpatient rehabilitation with a spousal caregiver.
Subjects And Methods: Stroke survivors (N = 97) were interviewed immediately after discharge to obtain scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Stroke Impact Scale, Geriatric Depression Scale-15, Perceived Stress Scale, and Perceived Health Status. Demographic and stroke-related data were abstracted from their inpatient rehabilitation charts. Descriptive and regression analyses determined the relationships among variables and the models that best predicted functional independence and perceived stress.
Results: Stroke survivors perceived a 50% recovery in their function upon discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, age, socioeconomic status, and number of complications predicted 63% of the variance of the total FIM score (F6,88 = 24.64; P < .0001). Total FIM, depression, and Stroke Impact Scale Emotion subscale predicted 45% of the Perceived Stress Scale score (F6,88 = 12.04; P < .0001).
Conclusions: Variables that predict the stroke survivors' recovery are complex as the severity of the stroke combines with demographic and economic variables and depression to predict functional independence and perceived stress. These factors need to be considered when preparing a discharge plan for stroke survivors who are discharged home from rehabilitation.
Association of Sarcopenia and Its Components with Depression Symptoms in Older Patients with Stroke.
Shiraishi R, Araki S, Ogawa T Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2024; 28(3):315-322.
PMID: 38952334 PMC: 11467511. DOI: 10.4235/agmr.24.0027.
Stroke Survivors and their Physiotherapists' Perceptions of Recovery: A Multiple Methods Approach.
Atama T, Leclair L, Pooyania S, Barclay R Physiother Can. 2023; 75(4):377-386.
PMID: 38037584 PMC: 10686302. DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2021-0068.
Lee E, Sohn M, Lee J, Kim D, Shin Y, Oh G Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(15).
PMID: 35954971 PMC: 9367998. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159612.
Zhang S, Yuan Y, Zhuang W, Xiong T, Xu Y, Zhang J Front Neurol. 2022; 13:843055.
PMID: 35812095 PMC: 9257184. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.843055.
Hinwood M, Ilicic M, Gyawali P, Coupland K, Kluge M, Smith A Ann Behav Med. 2022; 57(2):111-130.
PMID: 35689664 PMC: 9899067. DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaac002.