» Articles » PMID: 18592330

Which Regions of the Operating Gown Should Be Considered Most Sterile?

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2008 Jul 2
PMID 18592330
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Various guidelines have been proposed regarding which portions of a surgical gown may be considered sterile. Unfortunately, the validity of these recommendations has not been definitively established. We therefore evaluated gown sterility after major spinal surgery to assess the legitimacy of these guidelines. We used sterile culture swabs to obtain samples of gown fronts at 6-inch increments and at the elbow creases of 50 gowns at the end of 29 spinal operations. Another 50 gowns were swabbed immediately after they were applied to serve as negative controls. Bacterial growth was assessed using semiquantitative plating techniques on a nonselective, broad-spectrum media. Contamination was observed at all locations of the gown with rates ranging from 6% to 48%. Compared with the negative controls, the contamination rates were greater at levels 24 inches or less and 48 inches or more relative to the ground and at the elbow creases. The section between the chest and operative field had the lowest contamination rates. Based on these results, we consider the region between the chest and operative field to be the most sterile and any contact with the gown outside this area, including the elbow creases, should be avoided to reduce the risk of infection.

Citing Articles

Aerosol generating procedures in trauma and orthopaedics in the era of the Covid-19 pandemic; What do we know?.

Sobti A, Fathi M, Mokhtar M, Mahana K, Rashid M, Polyzois I Surgeon. 2020; 19(2):e42-e48.

PMID: 32883580 PMC: 7425761. DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.08.001.


Thyroid radiation shields: A potential source of intraoperative infection.

McAleese T, Broderick J, Stanley E, Curran R J Orthop. 2020; 22:300-303.

PMID: 32616992 PMC: 7322090. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.06.010.


Sterile Parts of Operating Gown during Lower Limb Joint Replacement Surgery.

Qoreishi M, Abbasian M, Safdari F Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019; 7(4):354-359.

PMID: 31448313 PMC: 6686066.


Evaluation of bacterial presence on lead X-ray aprons utilised in the operating room via IBIS and standard culture methods.

Jain S, Rajfer R, Melton-Kreft R, Nistico L, Miller M, Stoodley P J Infect Prev. 2019; 20(4):191-196.

PMID: 31428200 PMC: 6683606. DOI: 10.1177/1757177419833163.


Complications in musculoskeletal intervention: important considerations.

Wang D, DuBois M, Tutton S Semin Intervent Radiol. 2015; 32(2):163-73.

PMID: 26038623 PMC: 4447875. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1549447.


References
1.
Greenough C . An investigation into contamination of operative suction. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986; 68(1):151-3. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.68B1.3510215. View

2.
Pissiotis C, Komborozos V, Papoutsi C, Skrekas G . Factors that influence the effectiveness of surgical gowns in the operating theatre. Eur J Surg. 1997; 163(8):597-604. View

3.
Wimmer C, Gluch H, Franzreb M, Ogon M . Predisposing factors for infection in spine surgery: a survey of 850 spinal procedures. J Spinal Disord. 1998; 11(2):124-8. View

4.
Ellner P, Stoessel C, Drakeford E, Vasi F . A new culture medium for medical bacteriology. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966; 45(4):502-4. DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.502. View

5.
Al-Maiyah M, Bajwa A, Mackenney P, Port A, Gregg P, Hill D . Glove perforation and contamination in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(4):556-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B4.15744. View