» Articles » PMID: 18591353

Negative Impact and Positive Value in Caregiving: Validation of the COPE Index in a Six-country Sample of Carers

Overview
Journal Gerontologist
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2008 Jul 2
PMID 18591353
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The present study attempts to further validate the COPE Index on a large sample of carers drawn from six European countries.

Design And Methods: We used a cross-sectional survey, with approximately 1,000 carers recruited in each of six countries by means of a common standard evaluation protocol. Our saturation recruitment of a designated quota of carers occurred by means of several channels, in identified geographical zones within countries. Interviews were carried out with primary informal carers by use of a common assessment tool. We subjected items of the COPE Index to principal component analysis and we assessed emergent components through the use of Cronbach's alpha reliability procedures. We examined factor components as summative scales for confirmatory correlations with caregiving and psychological variables.

Results: Three components emerged, which we identified as the negative impact of caregiving, the positive value of caregiving, and the quality of support for caregiving. Internal consistency was good for negative impact and satisfactory for positive value and quality of support. Negative value was most consistently and strongly correlated with caregiving and psychological variables, although we did find diverse associations between these variables and the COPE Index subscales.

Implications: The COPE Index is a brief, first-stage assessment of some sophistication that can enable health and social care professionals to develop appropriately targeted interventions to enhance the positive aspects of the caregiving experience and quality of support, as well as reduce the negative impacts of caregiving.

Citing Articles

Caregiving burden, social support, and psychological well-being among family caregivers of older Italians: a cross-sectional study.

Bongelli R, Busilacchi G, Pacifico A, Fabiani M, Guarascio C, Sofritti F Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1474967.

PMID: 39507659 PMC: 11537916. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1474967.


Perceived Importance of Types and Characteristics of Support to Informal Caregivers among Spouse Caregivers of Persons with Dementia in Sweden: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire-Based Study.

Johansson M, McKee K, Dahlberg L, Williams C, Hammar L Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(10).

PMID: 39457321 PMC: 11506862. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21101348.


Self-Assessment Instruments for Supporting Family Caregivers: An Integrative Review.

Benedetti F, Hechinger M, Fringer A Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(10).

PMID: 38786426 PMC: 11120749. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12101016.


Integrating Perspectives on Family Caregiving After Critical Illness: A Qualitative Content Analysis.

Moale A, Motter E, Eisenhauer P, Gandhi N, Kim S, Girard T Am J Crit Care. 2024; 33(3):180-189.

PMID: 38688852 PMC: 11237965. DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2024309.


Resilience in caregivers of people with mild-to-moderate dementia: findings from the IDEAL cohort.

Martyr A, Rusted J, Quinn C, Gamble L, Collins R, Morris R BMC Geriatr. 2023; 23(1):804.

PMID: 38053063 PMC: 10696882. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04549-y.