» Articles » PMID: 18587547

[Periprosthetic Fractures. Long-term Results After Plate Osteosynthesis Stabilization]

Overview
Journal Unfallchirurg
Date 2008 Jul 1
PMID 18587547
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Due to the increasing age of patients and the rising number of joint replacements, the incidence of periprosthetic fractures (PPF) is also increasing. The treatment should be selected with knowledge of the prefracture interface status and the type of fracture involved. The aim of this study was to evaluate our treatment of PPF with long-term follow-up.

Patients And Methods: From 1988 to 2006, 99 patients with PPF were treated in our department. In 86 cases a plate osteosynthesis was used. After a mean time of 7.3+/-2.8 years, we studied 56 patients and monitored their complications.

Results: The most diagnosed fracture was Johansson type III (44%). Seventy-one patients were treated with a conventional and 15 with locking-plate osteosynthesis. In 15 cases (17.5%) we found severe complications (3 breaks and 3 dislocations of the plates, 6 cases of pseudarthrosis, 2 deep wound infections, and 1 case of postoperative bleeding).

Conclusion: Due to the minor frequency of severe complications, plate osteosynthesis of a periprosthetic fracture with a loosened interface is a good therapeutic option for individual patients, particularly for geriatric patients and those without disorders specific to a loosened interface.

Citing Articles

Preoperative Decolonization Appears to Reduce the Risk of Infection in High-Risk Groups Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Scharf M, Holzapfel D, Ehrnsperger M, Grifka J Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12(5).

PMID: 37237779 PMC: 10215900. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12050877.


Plate failure following plate osteosynthesis in periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Boesmueller S, Baumbach S, Hofbauer M, Wozasek G Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2015; 127(19-20):770-8.

PMID: 26187336 DOI: 10.1007/s00508-015-0818-3.


Periprosthetic femoral fracture - an interdisciplinary challenge.

Hagel A, Siekmann H, Delank K Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014; 111(39):658-64.

PMID: 25323023 PMC: 4200415. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0658.


[Periprosthetic and interimplant femoral fractures: Biomechanical analysis].

Rupprecht M, Schlickewei C, Fensky F, Morlock M, Puschel K, Rueger J Unfallchirurg. 2014; 118(12):1025-32.

PMID: 24893727 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-014-2591-6.


[Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty with specially constructed retrograde hollow nails].

Szalay G, Meyer C, Mika J, Schnettler R, Thormann U Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2014; 26(6):611-24.

PMID: 24535620 DOI: 10.1007/s00064-013-0236-5.


References
1.
Whittaker R, Sotos L, RALSTON E . Fractures of the femur about femoral endoprostheses. J Trauma. 1974; 14(8):675-94. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-197408000-00004. View

2.
Christensen C, Seger B, Schultz R . Management of intraoperative femur fractures associated with revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; (248):177-80. View

3.
Abendschein W . Periprosthetic femur fractures--a growing epidemic. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2003; 32(9 Suppl):34-6. View

4.
Pierson J, Jasty M, Harris W . Techniques of extraction of well-fixed cemented and cementless implants in revision total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Rev. 1993; 22(8):904-16. View

5.
Wahl B, Grasshoff H, Meinecke I, Neumann H . [Results of operative therapy of periprosthetic femur shaft fractures in total hip endoprostheses]. Zentralbl Chir. 2001; 126(1):50-4. DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-11726. View