Good Prognosis, Clinical Features, and Circumstances of Peanut and Tree Nut Reactions in Children Treated by a Specialist Allergy Center
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The diagnosis of nut allergy causes anxiety. Few studies exist that estimate risk of reactions and inform management.
Objective: To describe frequency and circumstances of reactions after the institution of a management plan.
Methods: Prospective study of children with peanut/nut allergy with an allergist's management plan. Severity and circumstances of worst reaction before diagnosis (index) and follow-up reactions were evaluated.
Results: A total of 785 children were followed for 3640 patient-years from diagnosis. Index reactions were mild in 66% (516), moderate in 29% (224), and severe in 5% (45). Fourteen percent (114/785) had follow-up reactions (3% annual incidence rate). Ninety percent had the same/reduced severity grade, and 1 of 785 (0.1%) had a severe reaction. Preschool children (n = 263) had a low incidence of reactions, and none were severe. There was a 3-fold reduction in injected epinephrine use from that used in the index reaction, required in 1 severe reaction, never twice; 14% (16/114) required no medication, 78% only oral antihistamines. Forty-eight percent reacted to the index nut type, 19% to a different nut (55% sensitized at diagnosis, 14% not sensitized, 31% not tested). Accidental versus index reactions were 4-fold more likely to be a result of contact exposure rather than ingestion. Contact reactions were always mild. Most (53%) reactions occurred at home, 5% in school, 21% at other sites (21% not recorded). The nut was given by a parent/self in 69 (61%) reactions or teacher in 5 (4%).
Conclusion: With a comprehensive management plan, accidental reactions were uncommon and usually mild, most requiring little treatment; 99.8% self-treated appropriately and 100% effectively.
Factors influencing accidental food allergic reactions in schools and preschools.
Crealey M, Byrne A Ir J Med Sci. 2023; 193(1):313-319.
PMID: 37284946 PMC: 10808491. DOI: 10.1007/s11845-023-03414-6.
Risk factors for severe reactions in food allergy: Rapid evidence review with meta-analysis.
Turner P, Arasi S, Ballmer-Weber B, Baseggio Conrado A, Deschildre A, Gerdts J Allergy. 2022; 77(9):2634-2652.
PMID: 35441718 PMC: 9544052. DOI: 10.1111/all.15318.
Incidence of anaphylaxis and accidental peanut exposure: A systematic review.
Muraro A, Sublett J, Haselkorn T, Nilsson C, Casale T Clin Transl Allergy. 2021; 11(8):e12064.
PMID: 34708943 PMC: 8694181. DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12064.
Use of multiple epinephrine doses in anaphylaxis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Patel N, Chong K, Yip A, Ierodiakonou D, Bartra J, Boyle R J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021; 148(5):1307-1315.
PMID: 33862009 PMC: 8588837. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.03.042.
Reaction phenotypes in IgE-mediated food allergy and anaphylaxis.
Chong K, Ruiz-Garcia M, Patel N, Boyle R, Turner P Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020; 124(5):473-478.
PMID: 31923546 PMC: 7251627. DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.12.023.