» Articles » PMID: 18583409

Differentiation Between Classic and Atypical Meningiomas with Use of Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2008 Jun 28
PMID 18583409
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: The differentiation between classic and atypical meningiomas may have implications in preoperative planning but may not be possible on the basis of conventional MR imaging. Our hypothesis was that classic and atypical meningiomas have different patterns of intratumoral water diffusion that will allow for differentiation between them.

Materials And Methods: Preoperative diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was performed in 12 classic and 12 atypical meningiomas. Signal intensity of solid-enhancing tumor regions on diffusion-weighted trace images and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) maps was assessed. Regions of interest (ROIs) were placed in solid-enhancing regions, peritumoral edema, and contralateral normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) to measure tensor metrics including major (lambda(1)), intermediate (lambda(2)) and minor eigenvalues (lambda(3)) and FA and ADC values. Distribution of tensor shapes within enhancing tumors was calculated for all tumors. Differences between classic and atypical meningiomas in tumor signal intensity, intratumoral and peritumoral tensor metrics, as well as tensor shapes distribution were statistically analyzed.

Results: A significantly greater proportion of atypical meningiomas were isointense and hypointense on ADC maps (P = .007). Classic meningiomas had significantly lower FA (P = .012), higher ADC (P = .011), greater lambda(2) (P = .020) and lambda(3) (P = .003). There was significantly more spherical diffusion in classic than in atypical meningiomas (P = .020). All diffusion tensor metrics for peritumoral edema of the 2 tumor groups did not differ.

Conclusion: DTI showed that intratumoral microscopic water motion is less organized in classic than in atypical meningiomas. This feature may allow for noninvasive differentiation between classic and atypical meningiomas.

Citing Articles

Malignant Meningiomas: From Diagnostics to Treatment.

Rowbottom H, Smigoc T, Ravnik J Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40075786 PMC: 11898517. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15050538.


Surgical Management of High-Grade Meningiomas.

Pacult M, Przybylowski C, Raza S, DeMonte F Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 38893100 PMC: 11171173. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16111978.


A Histopathologic Correlation Study Evaluating Glymphatic Function in Brain Tumors by Multiparametric MRI.

Gao M, Liu Z, Zang H, Wu X, Yan Y, Lin H Clin Cancer Res. 2024; 30(21):4876-4886.

PMID: 38848042 PMC: 11528195. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-0150.


Voxel-based clustered imaging by multiparameter diffusion tensor images for predicting the grade and proliferative activity of meningioma.

Takahashi Y, Oishi N, Yamao Y, Kunieda T, Kikuchi T, Fukuyama H Brain Behav. 2023; 13(10):e3201.

PMID: 37644780 PMC: 10570481. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3201.


Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Neuro-Oncology: Diagnosis, Post-Treatment Changes, and Advanced Sequences-An Updated Review.

Romano A, Palizzi S, Romano A, Moltoni G, Di Napoli A, Maccioni F Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(3).

PMID: 36765575 PMC: 9913305. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030618.


References
1.
Bondy M, Ligon B . Epidemiology and etiology of intracranial meningiomas: a review. J Neurooncol. 1996; 29(3):197-205. DOI: 10.1007/BF00165649. View

2.
Ide M, Jimbo M, Kubo O, Yamamoto M, Imanaga H . Peritumoral brain edema associated with meningioma--histological study of the tumor margin and surrounding brain. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1992; 32(2):65-71. DOI: 10.2176/nmc.32.65. View

3.
Lobato R, Alday R, Gomez P, Rivas J, Dominguez J, Cabrera A . Brain oedema in patients with intracranial meningioma. Correlation between clinical, radiological, and histological factors and the presence and intensity of oedema. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1996; 138(5):485-93; discussion 493-4. DOI: 10.1007/BF01411166. View

4.
Demaerel P, Wilms G, Lammens M, Marchal G, Plets C, Goffin J . Intracranial meningiomas: correlation between MR imaging and histology in fifty patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1991; 15(1):45-51. View

5.
Perry A, Stafford S, Scheithauer B, Suman V, Lohse C . Meningioma grading: an analysis of histologic parameters. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997; 21(12):1455-65. DOI: 10.1097/00000478-199712000-00008. View