» Articles » PMID: 18578856

Should the Surgeon or the General Practitioner (GP) Follow Up Patients After Surgery for Colon Cancer? A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol Focusing on Quality of Life, Cost-effectiveness and Serious Clinical Events

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2008 Jun 27
PMID 18578856
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: All patients who undergo surgery for colon cancer are followed up according to the guidelines of the Norwegian Gastrointestinal Cancer Group (NGICG). These guidelines state that the aims of follow-up after surgery are to perform quality assessment, provide support and improve survival. In Norway, most of these patients are followed up in a hospital setting. We describe a multi-centre randomized controlled trial to test whether these patients can be followed up by their general practitioner (GP) without altering quality of life, cost effectiveness and/or the incidence of serious clinical events.

Methods And Design: Patients undergoing surgery for colon cancer with histological grade Dukes's Stage A, B or C and below 75 years of age are eligible for inclusion. They will be randomized after surgery to follow-up at the surgical outpatient clinic (control group) or follow-up by the district GP (intervention group). Both study arms comply with the national NGICG guidelines. The primary endpoints will be quality of life (QoL) (measured by the EORTC QLQ C-30 and the EQ-5D instruments), serious clinical events (SCEs), and costs. The follow-up period will be two years after surgery, and quality of life will be measured every three months. SCEs and costs will be estimated prospectively. The sample size was 170 patients.

Discussion: There is an ongoing debate on the best method of follow-up for patients with CRC. Due to a wide range of follow-up programmes and paucity of randomized trials, it is impossible to draw conclusions about the best combination and frequency of clinic (or family practice) visits, blood tests, endoscopic procedures and radiological examinations that maximize the clinical outcome, quality of life and costs. Most studies on follow-up of CRC patients have been performed in a hospital outpatient setting. We hypothesize that postoperative follow-up of colon cancer patients (according to national guidelines) by GPs will not have any impact on patients' quality of life. Furthermore, we hypothesize that there will be no increase in SCEs and that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will improve.

Trial Registration: This trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The trial registration number is: NCT00572143.

Citing Articles

Follow-up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors.

L Hoeg B, Bidstrup P, Karlsen R, Friberg A, Albieri V, Dalton S Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 2019(11).

PMID: 31750936 PMC: 6870787. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012425.pub2.


Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer.

Jeffery M, Hickey B, Hider P Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 9:CD002200.

PMID: 31483854 PMC: 6726414. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002200.pub4.


Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer.

Jeffery M, Hickey B, Hider P, See A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 11:CD002200.

PMID: 27884041 PMC: 6464536. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002200.pub3.


Meta-analysis of colorectal cancer follow-up after potentially curative resection.

Mokhles S, Macbeth F, Farewell V, Fiorentino F, Williams N, Younes R Br J Surg. 2016; 103(10):1259-68.

PMID: 27488593 PMC: 5031212. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10233.


Do Patients Treated for Colorectal Cancer Benefit from General Practitioner Support? A Video Vignette Study.

Ngune I, Jiwa M, McManus A, Parsons R, Pagey G, Hodder R J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17(11):e249.

PMID: 26541077 PMC: 4642383. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4942.


References
1.
Papagrigoriadis S, Koreli A . The needs of general practitioners in the follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001; 27(6):541-4. DOI: 10.1053/ejso.2001.1106. View

2.
Northover J . Realism or nihilism in bowel cancer follow-up?. Lancet. 1998; 351(9109):1074-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)79375-2. View

3.
Moher D, Schulz K, Altman D . The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001; 357(9263):1191-4. View

4.
Grunfeld E, Levine M, Julian J, Coyle D, Szechtman B, Mirsky D . Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(6):848-55. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2235. View

5.
Jeffery M, Hickey B, Hider P . Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (1):CD002200. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002200.pub2. View