» Articles » PMID: 18565230

Understanding and Retention of the Informed Consent Process Among Parents in Rural Northern Ghana

Overview
Journal BMC Med Ethics
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2008 Jun 21
PMID 18565230
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The individual informed consent model remains critical to the ethical conduct and regulation of research involving human beings. Parental informed consent process in a rural setting of northern Ghana was studied to describe comprehension and retention among parents as part of the evaluation of the existing informed consent process.

Methods: The study involved 270 female parents who gave consent for their children to participate in a prospective cohort study that evaluated immune correlates of protection against childhood malaria in northern Ghana. A semi-structured interview with questions based on the informed consent themes was administered. Parents were interviewed on their comprehension and retention of the process and also on ways to improve upon the existing process.

Results: The average parental age was 33.3 years (range 18-62), married women constituted a majority (91.9%), Christians (71.9%), farmers (62.2%) and those with no formal education (53.7%). Only 3% had ever taken part in a research and 54% had at least one relation ever participate in a research. About 90% of parents knew their children were involved in a research study that was not related to medical care, and 66% said the study procedures were thoroughly explained to them. Approximately, 70% recalled the study involved direct benefits compared with 20% for direct risks. The majority (95%) understood study participation was completely voluntary but only 21% recalled they could withdraw from the study without giving reasons. Younger parents had more consistent comprehension than older ones. Maternal reasons for allowing their children to take part in the research were free medical care (36.5%), better medical care (18.8%), general benefits (29.4%), contribution to research in the area (8.8%) and benefit to the community (1.8%). Parental suggestions for improving the consent process included devoting more time for explanations (46.9%), use of the local languages (15.9%) and obtaining consent at home (10.3%).

Conclusion: Significant but varied comprehension of the informed consent process exists among parents who participate in research activities in northern Ghana and it appears the existing practices are fairly effective in informing research participants in the study area.

Citing Articles

Understanding the language barriers to translating informed consent documents for maternal health trials in Zambia: a qualitative study.

Beardmore-Gray A, Simwinga M, Vwalika B, Chinkoyo S, Chappell L, Sandall J BMJ Open. 2024; 14(4):e076744.

PMID: 38580359 PMC: 11002372. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076744.


Compliance with research ethics in epidemiological studies targeted to conflict-affected areas in Western Ethiopia: validity of informed consent (VIC) by information comprehension and voluntariness (ICV).

Tiruneh G, Yilma M, Wakuma B, Abdisa E, Bayisa L, Nichols M BMC Med Ethics. 2024; 25(1):9.

PMID: 38238678 PMC: 10795316. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01003-5.


Beyond translations, perspectives for researchers to consider to enhance comprehension during consent processes for health research in sub-saharan Africa: a scoping review.

Busisiwe N, Seeley J, Strode A, Parker M BMC Med Ethics. 2023; 24(1):43.

PMID: 37344810 PMC: 10286482. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00920-1.


Co-developing a common glossary with stakeholders for engagement on new genetic approaches for malaria control in a local African setting.

Chemonges Wanyama E, Dicko B, Pare Toe L, Coulibaly M, Barry N, Bayala Traore K Malar J. 2021; 20(1):53.

PMID: 33478519 PMC: 7818942. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-020-03577-y.


Cultural considerations for informed consent in paediatric research in low/middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Colom M, Rohloff P BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019; 2(1):e000298.

PMID: 30613801 PMC: 6307601. DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000298.


References
1.
Fortney J . Assessing recall and understanding of informed consent in a contraceptive clinical trial. Stud Fam Plann. 2000; 30(4):339-46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.1999.t01-5-.x. View

2.
Silverman H, Luce J, Lanken P, Morris A, Harabin A, Oldmixon C . Recommendations for informed consent forms for critical care clinical trials. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33(4):867-82. DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000159201.08203.10. View

3.
Chandramohan D, Owusu-Agyei S, Carneiro I, Awine T, Amponsa-Achiano K, Mensah N . Cluster randomised trial of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in infants in area of high, seasonal transmission in Ghana. BMJ. 2005; 331(7519):727-33. PMC: 1239974. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.331.7519.727. View

4.
Flory J, Emanuel E . Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. JAMA. 2004; 292(13):1593-601. DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.13.1593. View

5.
Krosin M, Klitzman R, Levin B, Cheng J, Ranney M . Problems in comprehension of informed consent in rural and peri-urban Mali, West Africa. Clin Trials. 2006; 3(3):306-13. DOI: 10.1191/1740774506cn150oa. View