» Articles » PMID: 18551519

Proton Transport Inside the Biofilm Limits Electrical Current Generation by Anode-respiring Bacteria

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2008 Jun 14
PMID 18551519
Citations 64
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Anode-respiring bacteria (ARB) in a biofilm anode carry out an oxidation half-reaction of organic matter, producing an electrical current from renewable biomass, including wastes. At the same time, ARB produce protons, usually one proton for every electron. Our study shows how current density generated by an acclimated ARB biofilm was limited by proton transport out of the biofilm. We determined that, at high current densities, protons were mainly transported out of the biofilm by protonating the conjugate base of the buffer system; the maximum current generation was directly related to the transport of the buffer, mainly by diffusion, into and out of the biofilm. With non-limiting acetate concentrations, the current density increased with higher buffer concentrations, going from 2.21 +/- 0.02 A m(-2) with 12.5-mM phosphate buffer medium to 9.3 +/- 0.4 A m(-2) using a 100-mM phosphate buffer at a constant anode potential of E(anode) = -0.35 V versus Ag/AgCl. Increasing the concentration of sodium chloride in the medium (0-100 mM) increased current density by only 15%, indicating that ion migration was not as important as diffusion of phosphate inside the biofilm. The current density also varied strongly with medium pH as a result of the buffer speciation: The current density was 10.0 +/- 0.8 A m(-2) at pH 8, and the pH giving one-half the maximum rate was 6.5. A j-V curve analysis using 100 mM phosphate buffer showed a maximum current density of 11.5 +/- 0.9 A m(-2) and half-saturation potential of -0.414 V versus Ag/AgCl, a value that deviated only slightly from the standard acetate potential, resulting in small anode-potential losses. We discuss the implications of the proton-transport limitation in the field of microbial fuel cells and microbial electrolytic cells.

Citing Articles

Modification of glass screen printed electrodes with graphene quantum dots for enhanced power output in miniaturized microbial fuel cells.

Mao Y, Amreen K, Calay R, Banerjee A, Goel S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29994.

PMID: 39622856 PMC: 11612443. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80925-x.


Interspecies ecological competition rejuvenates decayed Geobacter electroactive biofilm.

Ye Y, Zhang L, Hong X, Chen M, Liu X, Zhou S ISME J. 2024; 18(1).

PMID: 38916438 PMC: 11227281. DOI: 10.1093/ismejo/wrae118.


Carbon source priority and availability limit bidirectional electron transfer in freshwater mixed culture electrochemically active bacterial biofilms.

Michalska K, Brown R, Schroder U Bioresour Bioprocess. 2024; 10(1):64.

PMID: 38647932 PMC: 10991894. DOI: 10.1186/s40643-023-00685-w.


Elucidating the development of cooperative anode-biofilm-structures.

Klein E, Wurst R, Rehnlund D, Gescher J Biofilm. 2024; 7:100193.

PMID: 38601817 PMC: 11004076. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2024.100193.


Nanofiber applications in microbial fuel cells for enhanced energy generation: a mini review.

Yalcinkaya F, Torres-Mendieta R, Hruza J, Vavrova A, Svobodova L, Pietrelli A RSC Adv. 2024; 14(13):9122-9136.

PMID: 38500621 PMC: 10945513. DOI: 10.1039/d4ra00674g.