» Articles » PMID: 18550361

90-Days Mortality Rate in Patients Treated Within the Context of a Phase-I Trial: How Should We Identify Patients Who Should Not Go on Trial?

Overview
Journal Eur J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2008 Jun 14
PMID 18550361
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The primary objectives of phase-I trials include the definition of drug toxicities and the recommendation of phase-II doses. In order to safeguard the well-being of its participants, a common inclusion criterion is that of life expectancy >3 months. However, previous studies have shown that about 20% of these patients do not survive beyond this time-point.

Methods: We identified 97 patients who died within the first 90 days of treatment out of a total of 654 consecutively treated phase-I patients, from June 2003 to June 2007. This cohort was compared to a control group comprising 215 patients who lived >90 days on phase-I studies and were treated from January 2005 to June 2006.

Results: In keeping with our recently reported phase-I survival risk score, multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients who died within the first 90 days had lower albumin (p=0.010), greater number of metastatic sites (p=0.00001) and higher frequency of elevated LDH (p=0.0002). This analysis also showed that 86% of patients who died during the first 90 days had an increased risk score of 2/3 compared to 39% in the control group. Furthermore, three additional factors were identified, namely younger age (p=0.024), higher white cell count (p=0.028) and poorer ECOG PS (p=0.012) but the addition of these did not improve the ability to predict 90-day mortality compared to the afore-mentioned risk score.

Conclusions: There is good evidence that our easily derivable scoring system provides an objective method to identify patients with a very limited life expectancy in whom participation in phase-I trials should be carefully evaluated.

Citing Articles

Tumor fraction-based prognostic tool for cancer patients referred to early phase clinical trials.

Bayle A, Belcaid L, Cousin S, Trin K, Alame M, Rouleau E NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024; 8(1):227.

PMID: 39375508 PMC: 11458866. DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00685-9.


Refining patient selection for next-generation immunotherapeutic early-phase clinical trials with a novel and externally validated prognostic nomogram.

Losurdo A, Dipasquale A, Giordano L, Persico P, Lorenzi E, Di Muzio A Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1323151.

PMID: 38298193 PMC: 10828843. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1323151.


Establishing an evaluation index system of nursing quality for clinical drug trials: A Delphi study.

Chen J, Zhou H, Mai Q, Chen S, Liu Q, Shi M Nurs Open. 2023; 10(11):7266-7278.

PMID: 37680014 PMC: 10563411. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1979.


Clinical outcome and prognostic factors for Asian patients in Phase I clinical trials.

Loh J, Wu J, Chieng J, Chan A, Yong W, Sundar R Br J Cancer. 2023; 128(8):1514-1520.

PMID: 36797357 PMC: 10070409. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02193-2.


Development and Validation of an Early Mortality Risk Score for Older Patients Treated with Chemotherapy for Cancer.

Feliu J, Pinto A, Basterretxea L, Lopez-San Vicente B, Paredero I, Llabres E J Clin Med. 2021; 10(8).

PMID: 33920250 PMC: 8070509. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10081615.