» Articles » PMID: 18542063

Evidence-based Pragmatic Guidelines for the Follow-up of Testicular Cancer: Optimising the Detection of Relapse

Overview
Journal Br J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2008 Jun 11
PMID 18542063
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs) are the most common cause of cancer in men between the ages of 15 and 40 years, and, overall, the majority of patients should expect to be cured. The European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group has provided clear guidelines for the primary treatment of both seminoma and nonseminomatous germ cell tumours. There is, however, no international consensus on how best to follow patients after their initial management. This must promptly and reliably identify relapses without causing further harm. The standardising of follow-up would result in optimising risk-benefit ratios for individual patients, while ensuring economic use of resources. We have identified the seven common scenarios in managing seminomas and nonseminomas of the various stages and discuss the pertinent issues around relapse and follow-up. We review the available literature and present our comprehensive TGCT follow-up guidelines. Our protocols provide a pragmatic, easily accessible user-friendly basis for other centres to use or to adapt to suit their needs. Furthermore, this should enable future trials to address specific issues around follow-up giving meaningful and useful results.

Citing Articles

Postpubertal-Type Teratoma of the Retroperitoneal Space as a Late Recurrence of a Testicular Germ Cell Tumor: A Case Report With Clinical Insight.

Aslanova A, Ishida M, Takahashi R, Suzuki Y, Arizono E, Wakabayashi Y Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71667.

PMID: 39552994 PMC: 11568274. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71667.


Unveiling the genomic landscape of possible metastatic malignant transformation of teratoma secondary to cisplatin-chemotherapy: a Tempus gene analysis-based case report literature review.

Farag C, Johnston E, Antar R, Issa S, Gadiwalla Q, Tariq Z Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1192843.

PMID: 37427132 PMC: 10324607. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1192843.


The Role of CT in the Staging and Follow-Up of Testicular Tumors: Baseline, Recurrence and Pitfalls.

Pierre T, Selhane F, Zareski E, Garcia C, Fizazi K, Loriot Y Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(16).

PMID: 36010958 PMC: 9406011. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14163965.


Safety of Minimizing Intensity of Follow-up on Active Surveillance for Clinical Stage I Testicular Germ Cell Tumors.

Gariscsak P, Anson-Cartwright L, Atenafu E, Jiang D, Chung P, Bedard P Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022; 40:46-53.

PMID: 35638085 PMC: 9142749. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.03.010.


[Follow-up of testicular germ cell tumors-historical aspects and current recommendations].

Dieckmann K, Ruf C, Gubitz R, Wulfing C, Zengerling F Urologe A. 2022; 61(5):484-494.

PMID: 35384479 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-022-01815-6.


References
1.
Martin J, Panzarella T, Zwahlen D, Chung P, Warde P . Evidence-based guidelines for following stage 1 seminoma. Cancer. 2007; 109(11):2248-56. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22674. View

2.
Hoffman D, Lonstein J, Morin M, VISSCHER W, Harris 3rd B, Boice Jr J . Breast cancer in women with scoliosis exposed to multiple diagnostic x rays. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989; 81(17):1307-12. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/81.17.1307. View

3.
van den Belt-Dusebout A, Nuver J, de Wit R, Gietema J, Ten Bokkel Huinink W, Rodrigus P . Long-term risk of cardiovascular disease in 5-year survivors of testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(3):467-75. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.7193. View

4.
Gietema J, Meinardi M, Sleijfer D, Hoekstra H, van der Graaf W . Routine chest X-rays have no additional value in the detection of relapse during routine follow-up of patients treated with chemotherapy for disseminated non-seminomatous testicular cancer. Ann Oncol. 2002; 13(10):1616-20. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdf282. View

5.
Oliver R, Mason M, Mead G, von der Maase H, Rustin G, Joffe J . Radiotherapy versus single-dose carboplatin in adjuvant treatment of stage I seminoma: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2005; 366(9482):293-300. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66984-X. View