» Articles » PMID: 1854025

Effect of Intravenously Administered Dexmedetomidine on Pain After Laparoscopic Tubal Ligation

Overview
Journal Anesth Analg
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 1991 Aug 1
PMID 1854025
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ninety-six women undergoing laparoscopic tubal ligation were randomized to receive intravenously either 0.2 or 0.4 microgram/kg of dexmedetomidine, 60 micrograms/kg of oxycodone, or 250 micrograms/kg of diclofenac for postoperative pain in a double-blind study design. The study drugs were administered in the recovery room for moderate or severe pain and were repeated until pain subsided or disappeared. In the group receiving diclofenac, 83% of the patients required analgesic supplementation with morphine. This contrasted (P less than 0.01) with 33% of the patients receiving either oxycodone or the higher dose of dexmedetomidine. After the first dose of oxycodone was injected, the visual analogue scale for pain (0%-100%) was reduced from 58% to 33%, whereas corresponding pain relief was only achieved after the third injection of 0.4 microgram/kg of dexmedetomidine. Repeated doses of 0.2 microgram/kg of diclofenac or dexmedetomidine did not reduce the visual analogue scale value by more than 17%. More sedation was seen with the higher dose of dexmedetomidine than with either diclofenac or oxycodone (P less than 0.001). Both doses of dexmedetomidine decreased heart rate when compared with diclofenac (P less than 0.001). In the group given 0.4 microgram/kg of dexmedetomidine, 33% of the patients required atropine for bradycardia. The authors conclude that after laparoscopic tubal ligation, intravenously administered dexmedetomidine relieves pain and reduces opioid drug requirement but is attended by sedation and a high incidence of bradycardia.

Citing Articles

Dexmedetomidine with different concentrations added to local anesthetics in erector spinae plane block: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Li Q, Yang Y, Leng Y, Yin X, Liu J, Zhou C Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1326566.

PMID: 38841587 PMC: 11150627. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1326566.


Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil for controlled hypotension under general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xu N, Chen L, Liu L, Rong W PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0278846.

PMID: 36649357 PMC: 9844847. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278846.


A Randomized Control Trial of Three Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Doses for Procedural Sedation in Patients Undergoing Minor Gynaecological Surgery.

Sharma N, Pandey M, Gupta A, Kumar A Cureus. 2022; 14(3):e23309.

PMID: 35464558 PMC: 9014399. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23309.


Examination of the sedative and analgesic effects of gabapentin and dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

Zoroufchi B, Zangian H, Abdollahpour A J Family Med Prim Care. 2020; 9(2):1042-1047.

PMID: 32318464 PMC: 7113976. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_890_19.


The Effect of Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine Versus Morphine on Postoperative Morphine Requirements After Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery.

Zeeni C, Aouad M, Daou D, Naji S, Jabbour-Khoury S, Alami R Obes Surg. 2019; 29(12):3800-3808.

PMID: 31286397 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-019-04074-1.